TY - JOUR
T1 - A hybrid approach to monthly streamflow forecasting
T2 - Integrating hydrological model outputs into a Bayesian artificial neural network
AU - Humphrey, Greer B.
AU - Gibbs, Matthew S.
AU - Dandy, Graeme C.
AU - Maier, Holger R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Goyder Institute for Water Research , Project E.2.4. The authors are grateful to the two anonymous reviewers and the associate editor of Journal of Hydrology for their constructive and insightful comments, which have helped to improve and clarify this paper.
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - Monthly streamflow forecasts are needed to support water resources decision making in the South East of South Australia, where baseflow represents a significant proportion of the total streamflow and soil moisture and groundwater are important predictors of runoff. To address this requirement, the utility of a hybrid monthly streamflow forecasting approach is explored, whereby simulated soil moisture from the GR4J conceptual rainfall-runoff model is used to represent initial catchment conditions in a Bayesian artificial neural network (ANN) statistical forecasting model. To assess the performance of this hybrid forecasting method, a comparison is undertaken of the relative performances of the Bayesian ANN, the GR4J conceptual model and the hybrid streamflow forecasting approach for producing 1-month ahead streamflow forecasts at three key locations in the South East of South Australia. Particular attention is paid to the quantification of uncertainty in each of the forecast models and the potential for reducing forecast uncertainty by using the hybrid approach is considered. Case study results suggest that the hybrid models developed in this study are able to take advantage of the complementary strengths of both the ANN models and the GR4J conceptual models. This was particularly the case when forecasting high flows, where the hybrid models were shown to outperform the two individual modelling approaches in terms of the accuracy of the median forecasts, as well as reliability and resolution of the forecast distributions. In addition, the forecast distributions generated by the hybrid models were up to 8 times more precise than those based on climatology; thus, providing a significant improvement on the information currently available to decision makers.
AB - Monthly streamflow forecasts are needed to support water resources decision making in the South East of South Australia, where baseflow represents a significant proportion of the total streamflow and soil moisture and groundwater are important predictors of runoff. To address this requirement, the utility of a hybrid monthly streamflow forecasting approach is explored, whereby simulated soil moisture from the GR4J conceptual rainfall-runoff model is used to represent initial catchment conditions in a Bayesian artificial neural network (ANN) statistical forecasting model. To assess the performance of this hybrid forecasting method, a comparison is undertaken of the relative performances of the Bayesian ANN, the GR4J conceptual model and the hybrid streamflow forecasting approach for producing 1-month ahead streamflow forecasts at three key locations in the South East of South Australia. Particular attention is paid to the quantification of uncertainty in each of the forecast models and the potential for reducing forecast uncertainty by using the hybrid approach is considered. Case study results suggest that the hybrid models developed in this study are able to take advantage of the complementary strengths of both the ANN models and the GR4J conceptual models. This was particularly the case when forecasting high flows, where the hybrid models were shown to outperform the two individual modelling approaches in terms of the accuracy of the median forecasts, as well as reliability and resolution of the forecast distributions. In addition, the forecast distributions generated by the hybrid models were up to 8 times more precise than those based on climatology; thus, providing a significant improvement on the information currently available to decision makers.
KW - Bayesian artificial neural networks
KW - Conceptual hydrological models
KW - Hybrid modelling
KW - Monthly streamflow forecasting
KW - South Australia
KW - Uncertainty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976648644&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.026
DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.026
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84976648644
SN - 0022-1694
VL - 540
SP - 623
EP - 640
JO - Journal of Hydrology
JF - Journal of Hydrology
ER -