TY - JOUR
T1 - A systematic review of empirical and simulation studies evaluating the health impact of transportation interventions
AU - Stankov, Ivana
AU - Garcia, Leandro M.T.
AU - Mascolli, Maria Antonietta
AU - Montes, Felipe
AU - Meisel, José D.
AU - Gouveia, Nelson
AU - Sarmiento, Olga L.
AU - Rodriguez, Daniel A.
AU - Hammond, Ross A.
AU - Caiaffa, Waleska Teixeira
AU - Diez Roux, Ana V.
N1 - Funding Information:
LMTG worked under the auspices of the Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence which is funded by the British Heart Foundation , Cancer Research UK , Economic and Social Research Council , Medical Research Council , the National Institute for Health Research , UK and the Wellcome Trust [grant MR/K023187/1] . JDM was funded by the Universidad de Ibagué , Colombia [Project 17468 INT ]. FM was funded by the National Institutes of Health Fogarty International Center, USA [grant D43TW010540 ], and by the FAPA grant from the Universidad de los Andes, Colombia .
Funding Information:
The Salud Urbana en América Latina (SALURBAL)/Urban Health in Latin America project is funded by the Wellcome Trust , UK [grant 205177/Z/16/Z ]. More information about the project can be found at www.lacurbanhealth.org . We acknowledge the support of SALURBAL investigators. For more information on SALURBAL and to see a full list of investigators see https://drexel.edu/lac/salurbal/team/ .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - Urban transportation is an important determinant of health and environmental outcomes, and therefore essential to achieving the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals. To better understand the health impacts of transportation initiatives, we conducted a systematic review of longitudinal health evaluations involving: a) bus rapid transit (BRT); b) bicycle lanes; c) Open Streets programs; and d) aerial trams/cable cars. We also synthesized systems-based simulation studies of the health-related consequences of walking, bicycling, aerial tram, bus and BRT use. Two reviewers screened 3302 unique titles and abstracts identified through a systematic search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, TRID and LILACS databases. We included 39 studies: 29 longitudinal evaluations and 10 simulation studies. Five studies focused on low- and middle-income contexts. Of the 29 evaluation studies, 19 focused on single component bicycle lane interventions; the rest evaluated multi-component interventions involving: bicycle lanes (n = 5), aerial trams (n = 1), and combined bicycle lane/BRT systems (n = 4). Bicycle lanes and BRT systems appeared effective at increasing bicycle and BRT mode share, active transport duration, and number of trips using these modes. Of the 10 simulation studies, there were 9 agent-based models and one system dynamics model. Five studies focused on bus/BRT expansions and incentives, three on interventions for active travel, and the rest investigated combinations of public transport and active travel policies. Synergistic effects were observed when multiple policies were implemented, with several studies showing that sizable interventions are required to significantly shift travel mode choices. Our review indicates that bicycle lanes and BRT systems represent promising initiatives for promoting population health. There is also evidence to suggest that synergistic effects might be achieved through the combined implementation of multiple transportation policies. However, more rigorous evaluation and simulation studies focusing on low- and middle-income countries, aerial trams and Open Streets programs, and a more diverse set of health and health equity outcomes is required.
AB - Urban transportation is an important determinant of health and environmental outcomes, and therefore essential to achieving the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals. To better understand the health impacts of transportation initiatives, we conducted a systematic review of longitudinal health evaluations involving: a) bus rapid transit (BRT); b) bicycle lanes; c) Open Streets programs; and d) aerial trams/cable cars. We also synthesized systems-based simulation studies of the health-related consequences of walking, bicycling, aerial tram, bus and BRT use. Two reviewers screened 3302 unique titles and abstracts identified through a systematic search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, TRID and LILACS databases. We included 39 studies: 29 longitudinal evaluations and 10 simulation studies. Five studies focused on low- and middle-income contexts. Of the 29 evaluation studies, 19 focused on single component bicycle lane interventions; the rest evaluated multi-component interventions involving: bicycle lanes (n = 5), aerial trams (n = 1), and combined bicycle lane/BRT systems (n = 4). Bicycle lanes and BRT systems appeared effective at increasing bicycle and BRT mode share, active transport duration, and number of trips using these modes. Of the 10 simulation studies, there were 9 agent-based models and one system dynamics model. Five studies focused on bus/BRT expansions and incentives, three on interventions for active travel, and the rest investigated combinations of public transport and active travel policies. Synergistic effects were observed when multiple policies were implemented, with several studies showing that sizable interventions are required to significantly shift travel mode choices. Our review indicates that bicycle lanes and BRT systems represent promising initiatives for promoting population health. There is also evidence to suggest that synergistic effects might be achieved through the combined implementation of multiple transportation policies. However, more rigorous evaluation and simulation studies focusing on low- and middle-income countries, aerial trams and Open Streets programs, and a more diverse set of health and health equity outcomes is required.
KW - Complex systems
KW - Health
KW - Natural experiment
KW - Systematic review
KW - Transportation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083554564&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109519
DO - 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109519
M3 - Article
C2 - 32335428
AN - SCOPUS:85083554564
SN - 0013-9351
VL - 186
JO - Environmental Research
JF - Environmental Research
M1 - 109519
ER -