TY - JOUR
T1 - Almonds vs. carbohydrate snacks in an energy-restricted diet: weight and cardiometabolic outcomes from a randomized trial
AU - Carter, Sharayah
AU - Hill, Alison M.
AU - Mead, Lauren C.
AU - Wong, Hoi Y.
AU - Yandell, Catherine
AU - Buckley, Jonathan D.
AU - Tan, Sze Yen
AU - Rogers, Geraint B.
AU - Fraysse, Francois
AU - Coates, Alison M.
N1 - Funding Information:
AMC has consulted for Nuts for Life (an initiative of the Australian Tree Nut Industry). S‐YT has previously been involved in studies funded by the Californian Walnut Commission. AMC, JDB, AMH, and S‐YT have previously been involved in studies funded by the International Nut and Dried Fruit Council. The other authors declared no conflict of interest.
Funding Information:
This work was funded by the Almond Board of California. This funding source had no role in the design of this study or in the analysis and interpretation of the data.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Obesity published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Obesity Society.
PY - 2023/8/24
Y1 - 2023/8/24
N2 - Objective: This study evaluated weight and cardiometabolic outcomes after a 3-month energy-restricted diet (−30%) containing almonds (almond-enriched diet [AED]) or containing carbohydrate-rich snacks (nut-free control diet [NFD]) (Phase 1), followed by 6 months of weight maintenance (Phase 2). Methods: Participants (25–65 years old) with overweight or obesity (BMI 27.5–34.9 kg/m2) were randomly allocated to AED (n = 68) or NFD (n = 72). Results: Both groups lost weight during Phase 1 (p < 0.001) (mean [SE], −7.0 [0.5] kg AED vs. −7.0 [0.5] kg NFD, p = 0.858) and Phase 2 (p = 0.009) (−1.1 [0.5] kg AED vs. −1.3 [0.6] NFD, p = 0.756), with improvements in percentage lean mass after Phase 2 (4.8% [0.3%], p < 0.001). Reductions occurred in fasting glucose (−0.2 [0.07] mmol/L, p = 0.003), insulin (−8.1 [4.0] pmol/L, p = 0.036), blood pressure (−4.9 [0.8] mm Hg systolic, −5.0 [0.5] mm Hg diastolic, p < 0.001), total cholesterol (−0.3 [0.1] mmol/L), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (−0.2 [0.1] mmol/L), very low-density lipoprotein (−0.1 [0.03] mmol/L), and triglycerides (−0.3 [0.06] mmol/L) (all p < 0.001), and high-density lipoprotein increased (0.1 [0.02] mmol/L, p = 0.011) by the end of Phase 2 in both groups. There were group by time interactions for lipoprotein particle concentrations: very small triglyceride-rich (−31.0 [7.7] nmol/L AED vs. −4.8 [7.9] nmol/L NFD, p = 0.007), small LDL (−109.3 [40.5] nmol/L AED vs. −20.7 [41.6] nmol/L NFD, p = 0.017), and medium LDL (−24.4 [43.4] nmol/L AED vs. −130.5 [44.4] nmol/L NFD, p = 0.045). Conclusions: An energy-restricted AED resulted in weight loss and weight loss maintenance comparable to an energy-restricted NFD, and both diets supported cardiometabolic health. The AED resulted in greater improvements in some lipoprotein subfractions, which may enhance reductions in cardiovascular risk.
AB - Objective: This study evaluated weight and cardiometabolic outcomes after a 3-month energy-restricted diet (−30%) containing almonds (almond-enriched diet [AED]) or containing carbohydrate-rich snacks (nut-free control diet [NFD]) (Phase 1), followed by 6 months of weight maintenance (Phase 2). Methods: Participants (25–65 years old) with overweight or obesity (BMI 27.5–34.9 kg/m2) were randomly allocated to AED (n = 68) or NFD (n = 72). Results: Both groups lost weight during Phase 1 (p < 0.001) (mean [SE], −7.0 [0.5] kg AED vs. −7.0 [0.5] kg NFD, p = 0.858) and Phase 2 (p = 0.009) (−1.1 [0.5] kg AED vs. −1.3 [0.6] NFD, p = 0.756), with improvements in percentage lean mass after Phase 2 (4.8% [0.3%], p < 0.001). Reductions occurred in fasting glucose (−0.2 [0.07] mmol/L, p = 0.003), insulin (−8.1 [4.0] pmol/L, p = 0.036), blood pressure (−4.9 [0.8] mm Hg systolic, −5.0 [0.5] mm Hg diastolic, p < 0.001), total cholesterol (−0.3 [0.1] mmol/L), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (−0.2 [0.1] mmol/L), very low-density lipoprotein (−0.1 [0.03] mmol/L), and triglycerides (−0.3 [0.06] mmol/L) (all p < 0.001), and high-density lipoprotein increased (0.1 [0.02] mmol/L, p = 0.011) by the end of Phase 2 in both groups. There were group by time interactions for lipoprotein particle concentrations: very small triglyceride-rich (−31.0 [7.7] nmol/L AED vs. −4.8 [7.9] nmol/L NFD, p = 0.007), small LDL (−109.3 [40.5] nmol/L AED vs. −20.7 [41.6] nmol/L NFD, p = 0.017), and medium LDL (−24.4 [43.4] nmol/L AED vs. −130.5 [44.4] nmol/L NFD, p = 0.045). Conclusions: An energy-restricted AED resulted in weight loss and weight loss maintenance comparable to an energy-restricted NFD, and both diets supported cardiometabolic health. The AED resulted in greater improvements in some lipoprotein subfractions, which may enhance reductions in cardiovascular risk.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169078397&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/oby.23860
DO - 10.1002/oby.23860
M3 - Article
C2 - 37621033
AN - SCOPUS:85169078397
SN - 1930-7381
VL - 31
SP - 2467
EP - 2481
JO - Obesity
JF - Obesity
IS - 10
ER -