Approaches to determining occlusion pressure for blood flow restricted exercise training: Systematic review

James Murray, Hunter Bennett, Terry Boyle, Marie Williams, Kade Davison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Low-intensity exercise with blood flow restriction (BFR) is an increasingly common method of improving muscular strength and hypertrophy, and improving aerobic fitness, in clinical and athletic populations. The aim of this systematic review was to describe common approaches to determining occlusion pressures for BFR exercise. A comprehensive literature search yielded 1389 results, of which 129 were included. Studies were predominantly randomised control trials (86.7%) with modest sample sizes (average number of 11.4 ± 6.2 participants per BFR group/s) of young adults (average age of 34.6 ± 17.9). Five different approaches for determining occlusion pressure were identified: arbitrary pressures (56.6%), percentage of limb occlusion pressure (25.6%), brachial systolic blood pressure (10.9%), perceived tightness (3.9%) and other (3%). From 2016 to 2018, the number of published papers using a percentage of limb occlusion pressure increased yearly, paralleling a decrease use of arbitrary pressures. Of the studies included in this review, the most common approach to determining occlusion pressure was using a non-individualised, arbitrary pressure. Given the safety concerns associated with arbitrary pressures, continual dissemination regarding the optimal applications of BFR for safety and efficacy is required.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)663-672
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished or Issued - 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Blood flow restriction
  • common
  • occlusion pressure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this