Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Asciminib demonstrates superior efficacy and safety in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in the ASC4FIRST trial

  • Jorge E. Cortes
  • , Timothy P. Hughes
  • , Jianxiang Wang
  • , Dong Wook Kim
  • , Dennis Dong Hwan Kim
  • , Jiri Mayer
  • , Yeow Tee Goh
  • , Philipp le Coutre
  • , Gabriel Etienne
  • , Inho Kim
  • , David J. Andorsky
  • , Felice Bombaci
  • , Ghayas C. Issa
  • , Naoto Takahashi
  • , Shruti Kapoor
  • , Rajendra Jinwal
  • , Kamel Malek
  • , Tracey McCulloch
  • , Lillian Yau
  • , Richard A. Larson
  • Andreas Hochhaus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Many patients receiving frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) experience inadequate disease control and/or adverse events (AEs) that impair quality of life. Treatments offering optimal efficacy, safety, and tolerability will support long-term therapy. In the primary analysis from the ASC4FIRST trial, a phase 3 randomized trial comparing asciminib with investigator-selected TKIs (IS-TKIs) in newly diagnosed CML-CP, asciminib demonstrated superior efficacy vs all IS-TKIs and vs imatinib in the imatinib stratum, meeting both primary objectives. In the secondary analysis (2.2 years' median follow-up), major molecular response (MMR) rate at week 96 was 74.1% with asciminib vs 52.0% with IS-TKIs (treatment difference, 22.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 13.6-31.3]; 1-sided P < .001) and 76.2% with asciminib vs 47.1% with imatinib in the imatinib stratum (treatment difference, 29.7% [95% CI, 17.6-41.8]; 1-sided P < .001), meeting both key secondary objectives. MMR rate was 72.0% with asciminib vs 56.9% with second-generation (2G) TKIs (treatment difference, 15.1% [95% CI, 2.3-28.0]; 1-sided P < .05), suggesting possible clinical benefit, although the study was not designed to formally confirm statistical significance for this secondary end point. Safety/tolerability remained favorable with asciminib vs IS-TKIs. Dose reductions and interruptions, respectively, occurred with asciminib (18.5%; 46.5%), imatinib (23.2%; 47.5%), and 2G TKIs (54.9%; 63.7%). The hazard ratio for time to discontinuation of treatment due to AEs for asciminib vs 2G TKIs was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.215-0.997). With longer follow-up, asciminib continued to demonstrate a favorable benefit-risk profile over IS-TKIs and imatinib, supporting its potential as a treatment option for newly diagnosed CML-CP. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04971226.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1433-1446
Number of pages14
JournalBlood
Volume147
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished or Issued - 26 Mar 2026

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Immunology
  • Hematology
  • Cell Biology

Cite this