Assessing agreement between point of care and laboratory results for lipid testing from a clinical perspective

Angela Gialamas; Caroline O. Laurence; Lisa N. Yelland; Philip A. Tideman; Paul Worley; Mark D. Shephard; Rosy Tirimacco; Kristyn J. Willson; Philip Ryan; Janice Gill; David W. Thomas; Justin Beilby

doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.11.014

Assessing agreement between point of care and laboratory results for lipid testing from a clinical perspective

Angela Gialamas, Caroline O. Laurence, Lisa N. Yelland, Philip A. Tideman, Paul Worley, Mark D. Shephard, Rosy Tirimacco, Kristyn J. Willson, Philip Ryan, Janice Gill, David W. Thomas, Justin Beilby

SAHMRI Women And Kids

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Investigate agreement between lipid pathology results from point-of-care testing (PoCT) devices and laboratories. Design and methods: Agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. Results: Mean difference (limits of agreement) were: - 0.28??mmol/L (- 1.04, 0.48) for total cholesterol, - 0.09??mmol/L, (- 0.55, 0.36) for HDL-C. Median difference (nonparametric limits of agreement) were 0.07??mmol/L, (- 0.40, 3.04) for triglycerides. Conclusions: The clinical acceptability of the variation between lipid PoCT and laboratory test results is debatable but our work provides baseline data for further research. ?? 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Clinical Biochemistry
Pages	515-518
Number of pages	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.11.014
Publication status	Published or Issued - Mar 2010

Publication series

Name	Clinical Biochemistry
Volume	43

Keywords

General practice
Lipids
Point of care testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Health Professions(all)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.11.014

http://www.mendeley.com/research/assessing-agreement-between-point-care-laboratory-results-lipid-testing-clinical-perspective

Cite this

Gialamas, A., Laurence, C. O., Yelland, L. N., Tideman, P. A., Worley, P., Shephard, M. D., Tirimacco, R., Willson, K. J., Ryan, P., Gill, J., Thomas, D. W., & Beilby, J. (2010). Assessing agreement between point of care and laboratory results for lipid testing from a clinical perspective. In Clinical Biochemistry (pp. 515-518). (Clinical Biochemistry; Vol. 43). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.11.014

@inbook{c65be32dde43414c9e4b02055dbfef7b,

title = "Assessing agreement between point of care and laboratory results for lipid testing from a clinical perspective",

abstract = "Objectives: Investigate agreement between lipid pathology results from point-of-care testing (PoCT) devices and laboratories. Design and methods: Agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. Results: Mean difference (limits of agreement) were: - 0.28??mmol/L (- 1.04, 0.48) for total cholesterol, - 0.09??mmol/L, (- 0.55, 0.36) for HDL-C. Median difference (nonparametric limits of agreement) were 0.07??mmol/L, (- 0.40, 3.04) for triglycerides. Conclusions: The clinical acceptability of the variation between lipid PoCT and laboratory test results is debatable but our work provides baseline data for further research. ?? 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",

keywords = "General practice, Lipids, Point of care testing",

author = "Angela Gialamas and Laurence, {Caroline O.} and Yelland, {Lisa N.} and Tideman, {Philip A.} and Paul Worley and Shephard, {Mark D.} and Rosy Tirimacco and Willson, {Kristyn J.} and Philip Ryan and Janice Gill and Thomas, {David W.} and Justin Beilby",

year = "2010",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.11.014",

language = "English",

isbn = "1873-2933 (Electronic)\n0009-9120 (Linking)",

series = "Clinical Biochemistry",

pages = "515--518",

booktitle = "Clinical Biochemistry",

}

Gialamas, A, Laurence, CO, Yelland, LN, Tideman, PA, Worley, P, Shephard, MD, Tirimacco, R, Willson, KJ, Ryan, P, Gill, J, Thomas, DW & Beilby, J 2010, Assessing agreement between point of care and laboratory results for lipid testing from a clinical perspective. in Clinical Biochemistry. Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 43, pp. 515-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.11.014

TY - CHAP

T1 - Assessing agreement between point of care and laboratory results for lipid testing from a clinical perspective

AU - Gialamas, Angela

AU - Laurence, Caroline O.

AU - Yelland, Lisa N.

AU - Tideman, Philip A.

AU - Worley, Paul

AU - Shephard, Mark D.

AU - Tirimacco, Rosy

AU - Willson, Kristyn J.

AU - Ryan, Philip

AU - Gill, Janice

AU - Thomas, David W.

AU - Beilby, Justin

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Objectives: Investigate agreement between lipid pathology results from point-of-care testing (PoCT) devices and laboratories. Design and methods: Agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. Results: Mean difference (limits of agreement) were: - 0.28??mmol/L (- 1.04, 0.48) for total cholesterol, - 0.09??mmol/L, (- 0.55, 0.36) for HDL-C. Median difference (nonparametric limits of agreement) were 0.07??mmol/L, (- 0.40, 3.04) for triglycerides. Conclusions: The clinical acceptability of the variation between lipid PoCT and laboratory test results is debatable but our work provides baseline data for further research. ?? 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

AB - Objectives: Investigate agreement between lipid pathology results from point-of-care testing (PoCT) devices and laboratories. Design and methods: Agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. Results: Mean difference (limits of agreement) were: - 0.28??mmol/L (- 1.04, 0.48) for total cholesterol, - 0.09??mmol/L, (- 0.55, 0.36) for HDL-C. Median difference (nonparametric limits of agreement) were 0.07??mmol/L, (- 0.40, 3.04) for triglycerides. Conclusions: The clinical acceptability of the variation between lipid PoCT and laboratory test results is debatable but our work provides baseline data for further research. ?? 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

KW - General practice

KW - Lipids

KW - Point of care testing

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.11.014

DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.11.014

M3 - Chapter

C2 - 19961841

SN - 1873-2933 (Electronic)\n0009-9120 (Linking)

T3 - Clinical Biochemistry

SP - 515

EP - 518

BT - Clinical Biochemistry

ER -