TY - JOUR
T1 - Asymptomatic population reference values for three knee patient-reported outcomes measures
T2 - evaluation of an electronic data collection system and implications for future international, multi-centre cohort studies
AU - McLean, James M.
AU - Brumby-Rendell, Oscar
AU - Lisle, Ryan
AU - Brazier, Jacob
AU - Dunn, Kieran
AU - Gill, Tiffany
AU - Hill, Catherine L.
AU - Mandziak, Daniel
AU - Leith, Jordan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - Objectives: The aim was to assess whether the Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were comparable in asymptomatic, healthy, individuals of different age, gender and ethnicity, across two remote continents. The purpose of this study was to establish normal population values for these scores using an electronic data collection system. Hypothesis: There is no difference in clinical knee scores in an asymptomatic population when comparing age, gender and ethnicity, across two remote continents. Methods: 312 Australian and 314 Canadian citizens, aged 18–94 years, with no active knee pain, injury or pathology in the ipsilateral knee corresponding to their dominant arm, were evaluated. A knee examination was performed and participants completed an electronically administered questionnaire covering the subjective components of the knee scores. The cohorts were age- and gender-matched. Chi-square tests, Fisher’s exact test and Poisson regression models were used where appropriate, to investigate the association between knee scores, age, gender, ethnicity and nationality. Results: There was a significant inverse relationship between age and all assessment tools. OKS recorded a significant difference between gender with females scoring on average 1% lower score. There was no significant difference between international cohorts when comparing all assessment tools. Conclusions: An electronic, multi-centre data collection system can be effectively utilized to assess remote international cohorts. Differences in gender, age, ethnicity and nationality should be taken into consideration when using knee scores to compare to pathological patient scores. This study has established an electronic, normal control group for future studies using the Knee society, Oxford, and KOOS knee scores. Level of evidence: Diagnostic Level II.
AB - Objectives: The aim was to assess whether the Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were comparable in asymptomatic, healthy, individuals of different age, gender and ethnicity, across two remote continents. The purpose of this study was to establish normal population values for these scores using an electronic data collection system. Hypothesis: There is no difference in clinical knee scores in an asymptomatic population when comparing age, gender and ethnicity, across two remote continents. Methods: 312 Australian and 314 Canadian citizens, aged 18–94 years, with no active knee pain, injury or pathology in the ipsilateral knee corresponding to their dominant arm, were evaluated. A knee examination was performed and participants completed an electronically administered questionnaire covering the subjective components of the knee scores. The cohorts were age- and gender-matched. Chi-square tests, Fisher’s exact test and Poisson regression models were used where appropriate, to investigate the association between knee scores, age, gender, ethnicity and nationality. Results: There was a significant inverse relationship between age and all assessment tools. OKS recorded a significant difference between gender with females scoring on average 1% lower score. There was no significant difference between international cohorts when comparing all assessment tools. Conclusions: An electronic, multi-centre data collection system can be effectively utilized to assess remote international cohorts. Differences in gender, age, ethnicity and nationality should be taken into consideration when using knee scores to compare to pathological patient scores. This study has established an electronic, normal control group for future studies using the Knee society, Oxford, and KOOS knee scores. Level of evidence: Diagnostic Level II.
KW - Arthroplasty
KW - Assessment
KW - Automated
KW - Electronic
KW - Joint
KW - Knee
KW - Laptop
KW - Outcome
KW - Oxford
KW - Replacement
KW - Score
KW - Smartphone
KW - Validation
KW - iPhone
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042672220&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00402-018-2874-4
DO - 10.1007/s00402-018-2874-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 29330577
AN - SCOPUS:85042672220
SN - 0936-8051
VL - 138
SP - 611
EP - 621
JO - Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
JF - Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
IS - 5
ER -