Australian consensus statements for the regulation, production and use of faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice

Craig Haifer, Colleen R. Kelly, Sudarshan Paramsothy, David Andresen, Lito E. Papanicolas, Genevieve L. McKew, Thomas J. Borody, Michael Kamm, Samuel P. Costello, Jane M. Andrews, Jakob Begun, Hiu Tat Chan, Susan Connor, Simon Ghaly, Paul D.R. Johnson, Daniel A. Lemberg, Ramesh Paramsothy, Andrew Redmond, Harsha Sheorey, David Van Der PoortenRupert W. Leong

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    58 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has proved to be an extremely effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection, and there is interest in its potential application in other gastrointestinal and systemic diseases. However, the recent death and episode of septicaemia following FMT highlights the need for further appraisal and guidelines on donor evaluation, production standards, treatment facilities and acceptable clinical indications. Design For these consensus statements, a 24-member multidisciplinary working group voted online and then convened in-person, using a modified Delphi approach to formulate and refine a series of recommendations based on best evidence and expert opinion. Invitations to participate were directed to Australian experts, with an international delegate assisting the development. The following issues regarding the use of FMT in clinical practice were addressed: donor selection and screening, clinical indications, requirements of FMT centres and future directions. Evidence was rated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. Results Consensus was reached on 27 statements to provide guidance on best practice in FMT. These include: (1) minimum standards for donor screening with recommended clinical selection criteria, blood and stool testing; (2) accepted routes of administration; (3) clinical indications; (4) minimum standards for FMT production and requirements for treatment facilities acknowledging distinction between single-site centres (eg, hospital-based) and stool banks; and (5) recommendations on future research and product development. Conclusions These FMT consensus statements provide comprehensive recommendations around the production and use of FMT in clinical practice with relevance to clinicians, researchers and policy makers.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)801-810
    Number of pages10
    JournalGut
    Volume69
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished or Issued - 1 May 2020

    Keywords

    • Clostridioides difficile
    • FMT
    • faecal microbiota transplantation
    • inflammatory bowel disease
    • microbiome therapeutics
    • stool bank

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Gastroenterology

    Cite this