Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Avascular necrosis is associated with an increased risk of revision for infection compared to osteoarthritis in total hip replacement in younger patients: an analysis of 51,879 procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis is the most common indication for primary total hip replacement (THR) in Australia. Due to its pathogenesis, avascular necrosis (AVN) often occurs in younger patients. It is unclear whether AVN results in a higher revision rate when compared to osteoarthritis in this population. The aim of this study was to compare revision rates between these cohorts and identify any differences in cause for revision to better allow prognostication when consenting younger patients prior to surgery with the null hypothesis that no significant difference will be found. Methods: Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry data from 1999 to 2022 was used to assess difference in revision rates between the patients aged <55 years undergoing THR with a primary diagnosis of either AVN or osteoarthritis. Revision rates and reasons for revision were compared between cohorts. Results: There were 51,879 THR meeting the inclusion criteria available for analysis, of which 9.3% were implanted for AVN and 90.7% for osteoarthritis. Patients with AVN were younger and more likely to be male compared to patients with osteoarthritis. Rates of all cause revision were higher in patients undergoing surgery for AVN when adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, head-size, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. AVN had a higher rate of revision for infection (HR 1.61 [95% CI, 1.23–2.11] p < 0.001) and dislocation/instability after 1 month (1 Month+: HR 1.84 [95% CI, 1.31, 2.58)] p < 0.001). Increased risk of revision in the AVN group was found to occur early, within the first 3 months. There was no significant difference in the rate of revision for periprosthetic fracture, or implant loosening between groups. Conclusions: Younger patients undergoing THR for AVN have a higher revision rate and are more likely to be revised for early infection, when compared to patients who undergo THR for osteoarthritis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)269-277
Number of pages9
JournalHIP International
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished or Issued - Mar 2026

Keywords

  • Arthroplasty
  • avascular necrosis
  • hip
  • infection
  • loosening
  • osteoarthritis
  • revision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this