TY - JOUR
T1 - Case conferencing for palliative care patients - A survey of South Australian general practitioners
AU - To, Timothy H.M.
AU - Tait, Paul
AU - Morgan, Deidre D.
AU - Tieman, Jennifer J.
AU - Crawford, Gregory
AU - Michelmore, Alexandra
AU - Currow, David C.
AU - Swetenham, Kate
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© La Trobe University 2017.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Benefits of case conferencing for people with palliative care needs between a general practitioner, the person and other key participants include improving communication, advance care planning, coordination of care, clarifying goals of care and support for patient, families and carers. Despite a growing evidence base for the benefits, the uptake of case conferencing has been limited in South Australia. The aim of this study is to explore the beliefs and practice of South Australian general practitioners towards case conferencing for people with palliative care needs. Using an online survey, participants were asked about demographics, attitudes towards case conferencing and details about their most recent case conference for a person with palliative care needs. Responses were received from 134 general practitioners (response rate 11%). In total, 80% valued case conferencing for people with palliative care needs; however, <25% had been involved in case conferencing in the previous 2years. The major barrier was time to organise and coordinate case conferences. Enablers included general practitioner willingness or interest, strong relationship with patient, specialist palliative care involvement and assistance with organisation. Despite GPs' beliefs of the benefits of case conferencing, the barriers remain significant. Enabling case conferencing will require support for organisation of case conferences and review of Medicare Benefits Schedule criteria for reimbursement.
AB - Benefits of case conferencing for people with palliative care needs between a general practitioner, the person and other key participants include improving communication, advance care planning, coordination of care, clarifying goals of care and support for patient, families and carers. Despite a growing evidence base for the benefits, the uptake of case conferencing has been limited in South Australia. The aim of this study is to explore the beliefs and practice of South Australian general practitioners towards case conferencing for people with palliative care needs. Using an online survey, participants were asked about demographics, attitudes towards case conferencing and details about their most recent case conference for a person with palliative care needs. Responses were received from 134 general practitioners (response rate 11%). In total, 80% valued case conferencing for people with palliative care needs; however, <25% had been involved in case conferencing in the previous 2years. The major barrier was time to organise and coordinate case conferences. Enablers included general practitioner willingness or interest, strong relationship with patient, specialist palliative care involvement and assistance with organisation. Despite GPs' beliefs of the benefits of case conferencing, the barriers remain significant. Enabling case conferencing will require support for organisation of case conferences and review of Medicare Benefits Schedule criteria for reimbursement.
KW - case conference
KW - family meeting
KW - patient care team
KW - primary health care.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031793212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1071/PY16001
DO - 10.1071/PY16001
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28946942
AN - SCOPUS:85031793212
SN - 1448-7527
VL - 23
SP - 458
EP - 463
JO - Australian Journal of Primary Health
JF - Australian Journal of Primary Health
IS - 5
ER -