TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry on visual field loss in glaucoma patients
AU - Guo, Li Xia
AU - Fan, Su Jie
AU - Wang, Lan
AU - Chen, Yanyun
AU - Peng, Yi
AU - Liu, Wen Ru
AU - Sun, Lan Ping
AU - Liang, Yuan Bo
AU - Wang, Ning Li
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Objective: To compare the sensitivity of white-on-white perimetry (W/W) and blue-on-bellow perimetry (B/Y) on the visual field loss of (VFL) in glaucoma. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Participants: Forty-two glaucoma patients (seventy-one eyes). Methods: The Humphrey-II-750 automated perimetry was used to examine glaucoma patients with B/Y and W/W. Patients were divided into early, moderate and advanced groups according to the visual field test scoring from Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS). collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study (CIGTS) scores were used to determine severity of VFL. The mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD) and CIGTS scores were calculated and analyzed statistically by t-test. Main Outcome Measures: Mean deviation, Pattern Standard Deviation, CIGTS scores. Results: MD was significantly lower in B/Y(-8.65±3.89 dB; -14.94±3.22 dB, respectively) than in W/W (-3.29±2.40 dB; -10.04±2.73 dB, respectively) in early and moderate groups (t=-9.21, P<0.001; t=-4.89, P<0.001, respectively). However, it was significantly higher in B/Y(-22.07±2.64 dB) than W/W(-25.20±5.48 dB) in advanced group(t= 3.93, P<0.001). PSD was significantly higher in B/Y (4.17 dB±1.20 dB) than in W/W (3.22±2.90 dB) in early group (t=2.12, P<0.05). However, it was significantly lower in B/Y (5.19±2.43 dB; 5.56±3.09 dB, respectively) than in W/W (7.98±3.20 dB; 8.19±3.37 dB, respectively) in moderate and advanced groups (t=-3.04, P<0.01; t=-2.96, P<0.001, respectively). CIGTS scoring system was significantly higher in B/Y than in W/W in early group (t=2.67, P<0.05). However, it was significantly lower in B/Y than in W/W in moderate and advanced groups (t=-4.31, P<0.05; t=-4.02, P<0.001, respectively). Conclusions: B/Y perimetry is more sensitive than W/W perimetry in detecting early glaucoma. W/W perimetry is more sensitive than B/Y perimetry in detecting moderate and advanced glaucoma. This indicates that B/Y perimetry should be applied in early glaucoma detection, while W/W would be better in monitoring the progress of moderate and advanced glaucoma.
AB - Objective: To compare the sensitivity of white-on-white perimetry (W/W) and blue-on-bellow perimetry (B/Y) on the visual field loss of (VFL) in glaucoma. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Participants: Forty-two glaucoma patients (seventy-one eyes). Methods: The Humphrey-II-750 automated perimetry was used to examine glaucoma patients with B/Y and W/W. Patients were divided into early, moderate and advanced groups according to the visual field test scoring from Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS). collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study (CIGTS) scores were used to determine severity of VFL. The mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD) and CIGTS scores were calculated and analyzed statistically by t-test. Main Outcome Measures: Mean deviation, Pattern Standard Deviation, CIGTS scores. Results: MD was significantly lower in B/Y(-8.65±3.89 dB; -14.94±3.22 dB, respectively) than in W/W (-3.29±2.40 dB; -10.04±2.73 dB, respectively) in early and moderate groups (t=-9.21, P<0.001; t=-4.89, P<0.001, respectively). However, it was significantly higher in B/Y(-22.07±2.64 dB) than W/W(-25.20±5.48 dB) in advanced group(t= 3.93, P<0.001). PSD was significantly higher in B/Y (4.17 dB±1.20 dB) than in W/W (3.22±2.90 dB) in early group (t=2.12, P<0.05). However, it was significantly lower in B/Y (5.19±2.43 dB; 5.56±3.09 dB, respectively) than in W/W (7.98±3.20 dB; 8.19±3.37 dB, respectively) in moderate and advanced groups (t=-3.04, P<0.01; t=-2.96, P<0.001, respectively). CIGTS scoring system was significantly higher in B/Y than in W/W in early group (t=2.67, P<0.05). However, it was significantly lower in B/Y than in W/W in moderate and advanced groups (t=-4.31, P<0.05; t=-4.02, P<0.001, respectively). Conclusions: B/Y perimetry is more sensitive than W/W perimetry in detecting early glaucoma. W/W perimetry is more sensitive than B/Y perimetry in detecting moderate and advanced glaucoma. This indicates that B/Y perimetry should be applied in early glaucoma detection, while W/W would be better in monitoring the progress of moderate and advanced glaucoma.
KW - Glaucoma
KW - Visual field
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73549109208&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:73549109208
SN - 1004-4469
VL - 18
SP - 410
EP - 413
JO - Ophthalmology in China
JF - Ophthalmology in China
IS - 6
ER -