Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Parents under Pressure Programme for Methadone-Maintained Parents

Kim Dalziel, Sharon Dawe, Paul H. Harnett, Leonie Segal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)


Children living in families with parental substance abuse are at high risk of child maltreatment and associated adverse outcomes. A trial of methadone-maintained parents randomised to the Parents under Pressure (PuP) parenting programme reported significant improvements in family functioning relative to standard care or a brief intervention, as indicated by a reduction in scores on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory. We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of the PuP programme to inform policy and programme implementation. The cost per expected case of child maltreatment prevented was calculated and compared with the estimated lifetime costs of maltreatment and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Compared to usual care, the PuP programme costs an additional AU$8777 (£4880) per family to deliver. Assuming the most conservative estimate of one in five cases of maltreatment prevented, a cost-effectiveness estimate of AU$43 975 (£24 451) per case of potential maltreatment prevented for the PuP group was obtained. This is significantly less than the estimated mean lifetime cost of a case of child maltreatment of AU$200 000 (2013 present value) (£110 000). For 100 families in this population treated with PuP, there would be a net present value saving of an estimated AU$3.1 million (£1.7 million).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-331
Number of pages15
JournalChild Abuse Review
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished or Issued - 1 Sept 2015
Externally publishedYes


  • Child maltreatment
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Parenting
  • Substance abuse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Law

Cite this