Device-detected atrial fibrillation in a large remote-monitored cohort: implications for anticoagulation and need for new pathways of service delivery

Catherine J. O’Shea, Anthony G. Brooks, Melissa E. Middeldorp, Curtis Harper, Jeroen M. Hendriks, Andrea M. Russo, James V. Freeman, Rakesh Gopinathannair, Niraj Varma, Thomas F. Deering, Kevin Campbell, Prashanthan Sanders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Remote monitoring (RM) can facilitate early detection of subclinical and symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), providing an opportunity to evaluate the need for stroke prevention therapies. We aimed to characterize the burden of RM AF alerts and its impact on anticoagulation of patients with device-detected AF. Methods: Consecutive patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device, at least one AF episode, undergoing RM were included and assigned an estimated minimum CHA2DS2-VASc score based on age and device type. RM was provided via automated software system, providing rapid alert processing by device specialists and systematic, recurrent prompts for anticoagulation. Results: From 7651 individual, 389,188 AF episodes were identified, 3120 (40.8%) permanent pacemakers, 2260 (29.5%) implantable loop recorders (ILRs), 987 (12.9%) implantable cardioverter defibrillators, 968 (12.7%) cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) defibrillators, and 316 (4.1%) CRT pacemakers. ILRs transmitted 48.8% of all AF episodes. At twelve-months, 3404 (44.5%) AF < 6 min, 1367 (17.9%) 6 min–6 h, 1206 (15.8%) 6–24 h, and 1674 (21.9%) ≥ 24 h. A minimum CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 was assigned to 1704 (63.1%) of the patients with an AF episode of ≥ 6 h, 531 (31.2%) who were not anticoagulated at 12-months, and 1031 (61.6%) patients with an AF episode duration of ≥ 24 h, 290 (28.1%) were not anticoagulated. Conclusions: Despite being intensively managed via RM software system incorporating cues for anticoagulation, a substantial proportion of patients with increased stroke risk remained unanticoagulated after a device-detected AF episode of significant duration. These data highlight the need for improved clinical response pathways and an integrated care approach to RM. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12620001232921. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1659-1668
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Volume66
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished or Issued - Oct 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anticoagulation
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Cardiac implantable electronic device
  • Remote monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this