Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Disparities in GLP-1 and GIP responses to small intestinal glucose infusion in individuals with well- and poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes

  • Yixuan Sun
  • , Cong Xie
  • , Michelle Bound
  • , Karen L. Jones
  • , Michael Horowitz
  • , Ian A. Macdonald
  • , Richard L. Young
  • , Christopher K. Rayner
  • , Tongzhi Wu

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Aims: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are key regulators of glucose homeostasis in health and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Whether their secretion is influenced by antecedent glycaemic control in T2D remains unclear. This study compared GLP-1 and GIP responses to intraduodenal glucose infusion between individuals with well- and poorly-controlled T2D. Methods: 24 diet-controlled participants with T2D (n = 12 with HbA1c < 7.0% and n = 12 with HbA1c > 8.5%) received an intraduodenal infusion of 30 g glucose with 3 g 3-O-methylglucose (3-OMG; a marker of intestinal glucose absorption) over 30 min. Blood glucose was maintained comparably (6.4 ± 0.4 vs. 6.1 ± 0.3 mmol/L) by intravenous insulin. Plasma GIP, GLP-1 and C-peptide and serum 3-OMG were measured at frequent intervals. Results: Basal hormone concentrations were comparable between groups. In response to intraduodenal glucose infusion, the GIP response was greater in the poorly-controlled group (P = 0.02 for time*group interaction), with a trend for higher iAUC0-60min compared with well-controlled group (1329.9 ± 163.7 vs. 1009.5 ± 108.3 pmol/L*min, P = 0.12 unadjusted; P = 0.09 adjusted for age, sex and BMI). GLP-1 responses were lower in the poorly-controlled group (P = 0.007 for time*group interaction), with lower iAUC0-60min (453.3 ± 110.6 vs. 1037.5 ± 177.1 pmol/L*min, P = 0.01), but this difference became non-significant after adjustment for age, sex and BMI. C-peptide and 3-OMG responses were comparable. Conclusions: Poor glycaemic control in T2D is associated with a greater GIP, and lower GLP-1, response to small intestinal glucose, independent of intestinal glucose absorption. However, differences in GLP-1 may be influenced by age, sex and BMI, so should be interpreted cautiously and validated in larger cohorts.

Original languageEnglish
Article number113235
JournalDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Volume236
DOIs
Publication statusPublished or Issued - Jun 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)
  • Glucose absorption
  • Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)
  • Incretin
  • Type 2 diabetes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology

Cite this