TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of selection and selective genotyping for creation of reference on bias and accuracy of genomic prediction
AU - Gowane, Gopal R.
AU - Lee, Sang Hong
AU - Clark, Sam
AU - Moghaddar, Nasir
AU - Al-Mamun, Hawlader A.
AU - van der Werf, Julius H.J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding information Endeavour Research Fellowship (Govt. of Australia) for six-month research programme was granted to GRG at University of New England. GRG duly acknowledge the support provided by Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) Government of India, University of New England Australia, and financial support provided by Endeavour Research Fellowship (Australia). GRG also acknowledges the support provided by the Director ICAR-CSWRI to carry out the research. Dr. Rohan L. Fernando (Iowa State University, USA) and Dr. Andres Legarra (INRA, France) are gratefully acknowledged for the useful discussions. SHL is an Australian Research Council Future Fellow (FT160100229).
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - Reference populations for genomic selection usually involve selected individuals, which may result in biased prediction of estimated genomic breeding values (GEBV). In a simulation study, bias and accuracy of GEBV were explored for various genetic models with individuals selectively genotyped in a typical nucleus breeding program. We compared the performance of three existing methods, that is, Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of breeding values using pedigree-based relationships (PBLUP), genomic relationships for genotyped animals only (GBLUP) and a Single-Step approach (SSGBLUP) using both. For a scenario with no-selection and random mating (RR), prediction was unbiased. However, lower accuracy and bias were observed for scenarios with selection and random mating (SR) or selection and positive assortative mating (SA). As expected, bias disappeared when all individuals were genotyped and used in GBLUP. SSGBLUP showed higher accuracy compared to GBLUP, and bias of prediction was negligible with SR. However, PBLUP and SSGBLUP still showed bias in SA due to high inbreeding. SSGBLUP and PBLUP were unbiased provided that inbreeding was accounted for in the relationship matrices. Selective genotyping based on extreme phenotypic contrasts increased the prediction accuracy, but prediction was biased when using GBLUP. SSGBLUP could correct the biasedness while gaining higher accuracy than GBLUP. In a typical animal breeding program, where it is too expensive to genotype all animals, it would be appropriate to genotype phenotypically contrasting selection candidates and use a Single-Step approach to obtain accurate and unbiased prediction of GEBV.
AB - Reference populations for genomic selection usually involve selected individuals, which may result in biased prediction of estimated genomic breeding values (GEBV). In a simulation study, bias and accuracy of GEBV were explored for various genetic models with individuals selectively genotyped in a typical nucleus breeding program. We compared the performance of three existing methods, that is, Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of breeding values using pedigree-based relationships (PBLUP), genomic relationships for genotyped animals only (GBLUP) and a Single-Step approach (SSGBLUP) using both. For a scenario with no-selection and random mating (RR), prediction was unbiased. However, lower accuracy and bias were observed for scenarios with selection and random mating (SR) or selection and positive assortative mating (SA). As expected, bias disappeared when all individuals were genotyped and used in GBLUP. SSGBLUP showed higher accuracy compared to GBLUP, and bias of prediction was negligible with SR. However, PBLUP and SSGBLUP still showed bias in SA due to high inbreeding. SSGBLUP and PBLUP were unbiased provided that inbreeding was accounted for in the relationship matrices. Selective genotyping based on extreme phenotypic contrasts increased the prediction accuracy, but prediction was biased when using GBLUP. SSGBLUP could correct the biasedness while gaining higher accuracy than GBLUP. In a typical animal breeding program, where it is too expensive to genotype all animals, it would be appropriate to genotype phenotypically contrasting selection candidates and use a Single-Step approach to obtain accurate and unbiased prediction of GEBV.
KW - GWAS
KW - genomic selection
KW - prediction bias
KW - selective genotyping
KW - single-step GBLUP
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067445893&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jbg.12420
DO - 10.1111/jbg.12420
M3 - Article
C2 - 31215699
AN - SCOPUS:85067445893
VL - 136
SP - 390
EP - 407
JO - Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
JF - Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
SN - 0931-2668
IS - 5
ER -