Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing After Perinatal Death

the Genomic Autopsy Study Research Network, Camille M. Schubert, Matilda R. Jackson, Christopher P. Barnett, Hamish S. Scott, Thomas Sullivan, Stephen Goodall, Tracy Merlin, Abhi Kulkarni, Adrian Charles, Alan Ma, Amanda Engel, Anand Vasudevan, Andrew Paul Fennell, Anita Gorrie, Anna Le Fevre, Annabelle Enriquez, Ari Horton, Arjan Bouman, Benjamin KamienBethany Wadling, Bhavya Vora, Bruce Hopper, Cathryn Poulton, Christopher Richmond, Clara W.T. Chung, David J. Amor, Di Milnes, Krzesinski Emma, Erica Brown, Fiona Cunningham, Gargi Pathak, George McGillivray, Giorgina Maxwell, Helen Curd, Himanshu Goel, Hugh McCarthy, Jan Liebelt, Janene Davies, Jarrad Dearman, Jason R. Pinner, Jaye Richardson, Jennie Slee, Jennifer Rigby, Joanna Perry-Keene, Jonathan Rodgers, Kaitlin McGinnis, Karin Kassahn, Kate Riley, Kerrie Smyth, Mahalia S.B. Frank

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Following termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly or unexplained perinatal death (PND), clinical geneticists advise on possible genetic causes and likelihood of recurrence, often with limited use of molecular analysis. In the Australian Genomic Autopsy Study (GAS) cases that were unresolved following standard-of-care investigations underwent exome and/or genome sequencing (ES/GS). This diagnostic before-and-after study measured the changes in clinical management, in terms of the effect on clinical counselling that was provided to parents following ES/GS. Clinicians were surveyed before and after receiving sequencing results about the likelihood of recurrence and the reproductive planning advice they would provide to families. 161 pairs of before-and-after surveys were completed. Clinician estimates regarding PND recurrence changed for 45% (73/161) of families after receiving test results, despite a genetic diagnosis being found in only 19%. Families with an ‘unknown likelihood’ of recurrence reduced from 26% to 15% (p = 0.01). The information provided to parents about recurrence and reproductive planning increased significantly, both with and without a diagnosis, and clinicians reported that most parents expressed value was obtained from the investigation. The utility of genomic autopsy for clinical management is not restricted to families with a genetic finding.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical Genetics
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2025

Keywords

  • autopsy
  • clinical genetics
  • diagnostic before and after study
  • fetal anomaly
  • genetic counselling
  • genomic autopsy
  • genomic sequencing
  • perinatal death
  • reproductive planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this