TY - JOUR
T1 - Extrapolation of Survival Curves Using Standard Parametric Models and Flexible Parametric Spline Models
T2 - Comparisons in Large Registry Cohorts with Advanced Cancer
AU - Gray, Jodi
AU - Sullivan, Thomas
AU - Latimer, Nicholas R.
AU - Salter, Amy
AU - Sorich, Michael J.
AU - Ward, Robyn L.
AU - Karnon, Jonathan
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Financial support for this study was provided entirely by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). In addition, Nicholas R. Latimer was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR Postdoctoral Fellowship, PDF-2015-08-022) and is now supported by Yorkshire Cancer Research (award no. S406NL). The funding agreements ensured the authors’ independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research, the Department of Health and Social Care, or Yorkshire Cancer Research.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Background: It is often important to extrapolate survival estimates beyond the limited follow-up times of clinical trials. Extrapolated survival estimates can be highly sensitive to model choice; thus, appropriate model selection is crucial. Flexible parametric spline models have been suggested as an alternative to standard parametric models; however, their ability to extrapolate is not well understood. Aim: To determine how well standard parametric and flexible parametric spline models predict survival when fitted to registry cohorts with artificially right-censored follow-up times. Methods: Adults with advanced breast, colorectal, small cell lung, non–small cell lung, or pancreatic cancer with a potential follow-up time of 10 y were selected from the SEER 1973–2015 registry data set. Patients were classified into 15 cohorts by cancer and age group at diagnosis (18–59, 60–69, 70+ y). Follow-up times for each cohort were right censored at 20%, 35%, and 50% survival. Standard parametric models (exponential, Weibull, Gompertz, log-logistic, log-normal, generalized gamma) and spline models (proportional hazards, proportional odds, normal/probit) were fitted to the 10-y data set and the 3 right-censored data sets. Predicted 10-y restricted mean survival time and percentage surviving at 10 y were compared with the observed values. Results: Across all data sets, the spline odds and spline normal models most frequently gave accurate predictions of 10-y survival outcomes. Visually, spline models tended to demonstrate better fit to the observed hazard functions than standard parametric models, both in the censored and 10-y data. Conclusions: In these cohorts, where there was little uncertainty in the observed data, the spline models performed well when extrapolating beyond the observed data. Spline models should be routinely included in the set of models that are fitted when extrapolating cancer survival data.
AB - Background: It is often important to extrapolate survival estimates beyond the limited follow-up times of clinical trials. Extrapolated survival estimates can be highly sensitive to model choice; thus, appropriate model selection is crucial. Flexible parametric spline models have been suggested as an alternative to standard parametric models; however, their ability to extrapolate is not well understood. Aim: To determine how well standard parametric and flexible parametric spline models predict survival when fitted to registry cohorts with artificially right-censored follow-up times. Methods: Adults with advanced breast, colorectal, small cell lung, non–small cell lung, or pancreatic cancer with a potential follow-up time of 10 y were selected from the SEER 1973–2015 registry data set. Patients were classified into 15 cohorts by cancer and age group at diagnosis (18–59, 60–69, 70+ y). Follow-up times for each cohort were right censored at 20%, 35%, and 50% survival. Standard parametric models (exponential, Weibull, Gompertz, log-logistic, log-normal, generalized gamma) and spline models (proportional hazards, proportional odds, normal/probit) were fitted to the 10-y data set and the 3 right-censored data sets. Predicted 10-y restricted mean survival time and percentage surviving at 10 y were compared with the observed values. Results: Across all data sets, the spline odds and spline normal models most frequently gave accurate predictions of 10-y survival outcomes. Visually, spline models tended to demonstrate better fit to the observed hazard functions than standard parametric models, both in the censored and 10-y data. Conclusions: In these cohorts, where there was little uncertainty in the observed data, the spline models performed well when extrapolating beyond the observed data. Spline models should be routinely included in the set of models that are fitted when extrapolating cancer survival data.
KW - Royston and Parmar spline models
KW - censoring
KW - cost-effectiveness analysis
KW - extrapolation
KW - flexible parametric spline models
KW - model selection
KW - modeling
KW - oncology
KW - overall survival
KW - parametric models
KW - prediction
KW - restricted mean survival time
KW - survival analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097929511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0272989X20978958
DO - 10.1177/0272989X20978958
M3 - Article
C2 - 33349137
AN - SCOPUS:85097929511
SN - 0272-989X
VL - 41
SP - 179
EP - 193
JO - Medical Decision Making
JF - Medical Decision Making
IS - 2
ER -