TY - JOUR
T1 - Hematomas of at least 5 cm and outcomes in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention
T2 - Insights from the SafeTy and Efficacy of Enoxaparin in PCI patients, an internationaL randomized Evaluation (STEEPLE) trial
AU - White, Harvey D.
AU - Aylward, Philip E.
AU - Gallo, Richard
AU - Bode, Christoph
AU - Steg, Gabriel
AU - Steinhubl, Steven R.
AU - Montalescot, Gilles
N1 - Funding Information:
Prof H. White has received research grants from sanofi-aventis, Eli Lilly, The Medicines Company, NIH, Pfizer, Roche, Johnson & Johnson, Schering Plough, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, AstraZeneca, GSK, and Daiichi Sankyo Pharma Development. He has been a consultant for GSK and sanofi-aventis. Dr P. E. Aylward reports receiving grant support from sanofi-aventis, Proctor and Gamble, Alexion, The Medicines Company, Schering Plough, and Eli Lilly, as well as consulting fees and lecture fees from sanofi-aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr R. Gallo reports having received grant support and consulting fees from AstraZeneca Inc, Biovail Pharmaceuticals, sanofi-aventis, and Schering Plough and lecture fees from Abbott Interventional, Biovail Pharmaceuticals, and sanofi-aventis. Dr C. Bode reports receiving consulting fees and lecture fees from sanofi-aventis, Lilly, and GlaxoSmithKline; lecture fees from AstraZeneca; and consulting fees from Nycomed, Bayer, and Schering Plough, as well as consulting fees from Nycomed and lecture fees from AstraZeneca. Prof P. G. Steg reports receiving grant support from sanofi-aventis; receiving consulting fees from sanofi-aventis, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Endotis, Lilly, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Servier, and The Medicines Company; and being on the speakers bureau of AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Nycomed, sanofi-aventis, Sankyo, Servier, The Medicines Company, and ZLB Behring. Dr S. R. Steinhubl is currently employed by The Medicines Company. Prior to this appointment, S. R. Steinhubl reports receiving consulting fees from sanofi-aventis, The Medicines Company, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Cardax Pharmaceuticals, and Daiichi Sankyo. Prof G. Montalescot reports receiving grant support, consulting fees, and lecture fees from sanofi-aventis, Eli Lilly, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; consulting fees from Schering-Plough and The Medicines Company; and lecture fees from GlaxoSmithKline.
Funding Information:
The STEEPLE study was supported by sanofi-aventis. No extramural funding was used to support this work. Editorial support was provided by sanofi-aventis. The authors are solely responsible for the design and conduct of this study, all study analyses, the drafting and editing of the paper, and its final contents.
PY - 2010/1
Y1 - 2010/1
N2 - Background: Major bleeding significantly impacts outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). No uniform definitions exist for major and minor bleeding. Hematomas ≥5 cm at the femoral puncture site are considered major bleeding events in some trials and minor in others. Limited information is available on the incidence and clinical relevance of hematomas ≥5 cm in PCI patients. Methods: Data from the STEEPLE trial in patients undergoing elective PCI were used to assess the impact of hematomas ≥5 cm on ischemic outcomes (mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or urgent target vessel revascularization) up to day 30 and all-cause 1-year mortality. Hematoma data were available for 3,342 of 3,528 patients in STEEPLE. Patients with (n = 103) and without (n = 3,239) hematomas ≥5 cm were evenly distributed across treatment groups. Results: No differences were observed in 30-day ischemic outcomes between patients with and without hematomas (5.8% vs 5.9%, respectively; P = .96). No transfusions were observed in patients with hematomas as compared with patients without hematomas (0% and 0.4%, respectively; P = .52). A greater reduction in hemoglobin was observed (pre- vs post-PCI) in patients with hematomas as compared with patients without hematomas (-0.84 vs -0.35 g/L, P ≤ .001). No significant difference in all-cause 1-year mortality was observed between patients with and without hematomas (0.0% vs 1.7%, P = .98). Conclusions: After PCI, hematomas ≥5 cm had no effect on 30-day ischemic events or 1-year mortality. Although there is no agreed classification for large hematomas, the lack of a relationship between hematomas ≥5 cm and clinical outcome after PCI justifies the classification of these hematomas as minor bleeds in STEEPLE.
AB - Background: Major bleeding significantly impacts outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). No uniform definitions exist for major and minor bleeding. Hematomas ≥5 cm at the femoral puncture site are considered major bleeding events in some trials and minor in others. Limited information is available on the incidence and clinical relevance of hematomas ≥5 cm in PCI patients. Methods: Data from the STEEPLE trial in patients undergoing elective PCI were used to assess the impact of hematomas ≥5 cm on ischemic outcomes (mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or urgent target vessel revascularization) up to day 30 and all-cause 1-year mortality. Hematoma data were available for 3,342 of 3,528 patients in STEEPLE. Patients with (n = 103) and without (n = 3,239) hematomas ≥5 cm were evenly distributed across treatment groups. Results: No differences were observed in 30-day ischemic outcomes between patients with and without hematomas (5.8% vs 5.9%, respectively; P = .96). No transfusions were observed in patients with hematomas as compared with patients without hematomas (0% and 0.4%, respectively; P = .52). A greater reduction in hemoglobin was observed (pre- vs post-PCI) in patients with hematomas as compared with patients without hematomas (-0.84 vs -0.35 g/L, P ≤ .001). No significant difference in all-cause 1-year mortality was observed between patients with and without hematomas (0.0% vs 1.7%, P = .98). Conclusions: After PCI, hematomas ≥5 cm had no effect on 30-day ischemic events or 1-year mortality. Although there is no agreed classification for large hematomas, the lack of a relationship between hematomas ≥5 cm and clinical outcome after PCI justifies the classification of these hematomas as minor bleeds in STEEPLE.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72149101267&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.034
DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.034
M3 - Article
C2 - 20102875
AN - SCOPUS:72149101267
SN - 0002-8703
VL - 159
SP - 110
EP - 116
JO - American Heart Journal
JF - American Heart Journal
IS - 1
ER -