TY - JOUR
T1 - Home hemodialysis and mortality risk in Australian and New Zealand populations
AU - Marshall, Mark R.
AU - Hawley, Carmel M.
AU - Kerr, Peter G.
AU - Polkinghorne, Kevan R.
AU - Marshall, Roger J.
AU - Agar, John W.M.
AU - McDonald, Stephen
N1 - Funding Information:
Support : This study has been supported in part by the Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust (grant no. MPPT/06/04 ). The ANZDATA Registry receives funding from the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing and the New Zealand Ministry of Health and Kidney Health Australia. General support for registry activities has been received from AMGEN Australia Pty Ltd, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Australia Pty Ltd, Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd, Fresenius Medical Care-Australia Pty Ltd, Roche Products (Australia) Ltd, and Wyeth Australia Pty Ltd.
Funding Information:
Financial Disclosure : Dr Marshall has received honoraria as an advisor to Abbott Australia Pty Ltd and travel grants from Roche Products NZ Ltd , Novartis NZ Ltd , and Fresenius Medical Care–Asia-Pacific Pty Ltd ; Dr Hawley has received speaking honoraria, travel, and research grants from Fresenius Medical Care–Australia Pty Ltd and Baxter Healthcare and research grants from Gambro Australia Pty Ltd ; Dr Kerr has received honoraria as an advisor, speaking honoraria and travel grants from Fresenius Medical Care–Australia Pty Ltd , and Baxter Healthcare and has received speaking honoraria and travel grants from AMGEN Australia and Genzyme Australia ; Dr Polkinghorne has received speaking honoraria from AMGEN Australia and Jansen-Cilag Pty Ltd and travel grants from AMGEN Australia ; Dr Agar has received honoraria as an advisor to Renal Solutions Inc and speaking honoraria from AMGEN Australia and Baxter Healthcare, and speaking honoraria and travel grants from AMGEN Australia and Fresenius Medical Care-Australia Pty Ltd ; Dr McDonald has received speaking honoraria from AMGEN Australia, Fresenius Medical Care–Australia Pty Ltd, and Solvay Pharmaceuticals and travel grants from AMGEN Australia , Genzyme Australia , and Jansen-Cilag Pty Ltd . The remaining author declares that he has no relevant financial interests.
PY - 2011/11
Y1 - 2011/11
N2 - Background: There is a resurgence of interest in home hemodialysis (HD), especially frequent or extended forms involving unconventionally frequent (>3 times/wk) and/or long (>6 hours) treatments. This resurgence is driven by cost containment and experience suggesting lower mortality risk compared with facility HD and peritoneal dialysis (PD). Study Design: We performed an observational cohort study using the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, using marginal structural modeling to adjust for time-varying medical comorbidity as both a source of selection bias and an intermediary variable on the causal pathway to death. Setting & Participants: All adult patients starting renal replacement therapy in Australia and New Zealand since March 31, 1996, followed up to December 31, 2007. Predictor: The main predictor was dialysis modality (conventional facility HD, conventional home HD, frequent/extended facility HD, frequent/extended home HD, and PD). We adjusted for the confounding effects of patient demographics and comorbid conditions. Outcome: Patient mortality. Results: We analyzed 26,016 patients with 856,007 patient-months of follow-up. Relative to conventional facility HD, adjusted mortality HRs were 0.51 (95% CI, 0.44-0.59) for conventional home HD, 1.16 (95% CI, 0.94-1.44) for frequent/extended facility HD, 0.53 (95% CI, 0.41-0.68) for frequent/extended home HD, and 1.10 (95% CI, 1.06-1.16) for PD. The apparent benefit of home HD on mortality risk was less for patients who were nonwhite, non-Asian, and older. Limitations: Potential for residual confounding from the limited collection of comorbid conditions (no collection of cognitive or motor impairment, depression, left ventricular volume or structure, or blood pressure/fluid volume status) and lack of socioeconomic, medication, and biochemical data in analyses. Conclusions: Our study supports a survival advantage of home HD without a difference between conventional and frequent/extended modalities. Suitably designed clinical trials of frequent/extended HD are needed to determine the presence and extent of mortality benefit with this modality.
AB - Background: There is a resurgence of interest in home hemodialysis (HD), especially frequent or extended forms involving unconventionally frequent (>3 times/wk) and/or long (>6 hours) treatments. This resurgence is driven by cost containment and experience suggesting lower mortality risk compared with facility HD and peritoneal dialysis (PD). Study Design: We performed an observational cohort study using the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, using marginal structural modeling to adjust for time-varying medical comorbidity as both a source of selection bias and an intermediary variable on the causal pathway to death. Setting & Participants: All adult patients starting renal replacement therapy in Australia and New Zealand since March 31, 1996, followed up to December 31, 2007. Predictor: The main predictor was dialysis modality (conventional facility HD, conventional home HD, frequent/extended facility HD, frequent/extended home HD, and PD). We adjusted for the confounding effects of patient demographics and comorbid conditions. Outcome: Patient mortality. Results: We analyzed 26,016 patients with 856,007 patient-months of follow-up. Relative to conventional facility HD, adjusted mortality HRs were 0.51 (95% CI, 0.44-0.59) for conventional home HD, 1.16 (95% CI, 0.94-1.44) for frequent/extended facility HD, 0.53 (95% CI, 0.41-0.68) for frequent/extended home HD, and 1.10 (95% CI, 1.06-1.16) for PD. The apparent benefit of home HD on mortality risk was less for patients who were nonwhite, non-Asian, and older. Limitations: Potential for residual confounding from the limited collection of comorbid conditions (no collection of cognitive or motor impairment, depression, left ventricular volume or structure, or blood pressure/fluid volume status) and lack of socioeconomic, medication, and biochemical data in analyses. Conclusions: Our study supports a survival advantage of home HD without a difference between conventional and frequent/extended modalities. Suitably designed clinical trials of frequent/extended HD are needed to determine the presence and extent of mortality benefit with this modality.
KW - Home hemodialysis
KW - dialysis modality
KW - marginal structural models
KW - mortality
KW - multivariate analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054974591&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.04.027
DO - 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.04.027
M3 - Article
C2 - 21816526
AN - SCOPUS:80054974591
VL - 58
SP - 782
EP - 793
JO - American Journal of Kidney Diseases
JF - American Journal of Kidney Diseases
SN - 0272-6386
IS - 5
ER -