TY - JOUR
T1 - Maintenance tocolysis with nifedipine in threatened preterm labour
T2 - 2-year follow up of the offspring in the APOSTEL II trial
AU - van Vliet, E. O.G.
AU - Seinen, L.
AU - Roos, C.
AU - Schuit, E.
AU - Scheepers, H. C.J.
AU - Bloemenkamp, K. W.M.
AU - Duvekot, J. J.
AU - van Eyck, J.
AU - Kok, J. H.
AU - Lotgering, F. K.
AU - van Baar, A.
AU - van Wassenaer-Leemhuis, A. G.
AU - Franssen, M. T.
AU - Porath, M. M.
AU - van der Post, J. A.M.
AU - Franx, A.
AU - Mol, B. W.J.
AU - Oudijk, M. A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Objective: To evaluate long-term effects of maintenance tocolysis with nifedipine on neurodevelopmental outcome of the infant. Design, Setting and Population: Follow up of infants of women who participated in a multicentre randomised controlled trial on maintenance tocolysis with nifedipine versus placebo. Methods: Two years after the APOSTEL II trial on maintenance tocolysis with nifedipine versus placebo, we asked participants to complete the Ages and Stages Questionnaire. Main outcome measures: Infant development was measured in five domains. Developmental delay was defined as a score of ≤1 SD in one or more developmental domains. We performed exploratory subgroup analysis in women with preterm prolonged rupture of the membranes, and in women with a cervical length <10 mm at study entry. Results: Of the 276 women eligible for follow up, 135 (52.5%) returned the questionnaire, encompassing data of 170 infants. At 2 years of age, infants of women with nifedipine maintenance tocolysis compared with placebo had a higher overall incidence of fine motor problems (22.2 versus 7.6%, OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.29–9.14, P = 0.01), and a lower incidence of poor problem-solving (21.1 versus 29.1%, OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08-0.95, P = 0.04). Conclusions: This follow-up study revealed no clear benefit of nifedipine maintenance tocolysis at 2 years of age. As short-term adverse perinatal outcome was not reduced in the original APOSTEL II trial, we conclude that maintenance tocolysis does not appear to be beneficial at this time. Tweetable abstract: No clear benefit of nifedipine maintenance tocolysis in preterm labour on 2-year infant outcome.
AB - Objective: To evaluate long-term effects of maintenance tocolysis with nifedipine on neurodevelopmental outcome of the infant. Design, Setting and Population: Follow up of infants of women who participated in a multicentre randomised controlled trial on maintenance tocolysis with nifedipine versus placebo. Methods: Two years after the APOSTEL II trial on maintenance tocolysis with nifedipine versus placebo, we asked participants to complete the Ages and Stages Questionnaire. Main outcome measures: Infant development was measured in five domains. Developmental delay was defined as a score of ≤1 SD in one or more developmental domains. We performed exploratory subgroup analysis in women with preterm prolonged rupture of the membranes, and in women with a cervical length <10 mm at study entry. Results: Of the 276 women eligible for follow up, 135 (52.5%) returned the questionnaire, encompassing data of 170 infants. At 2 years of age, infants of women with nifedipine maintenance tocolysis compared with placebo had a higher overall incidence of fine motor problems (22.2 versus 7.6%, OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.29–9.14, P = 0.01), and a lower incidence of poor problem-solving (21.1 versus 29.1%, OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08-0.95, P = 0.04). Conclusions: This follow-up study revealed no clear benefit of nifedipine maintenance tocolysis at 2 years of age. As short-term adverse perinatal outcome was not reduced in the original APOSTEL II trial, we conclude that maintenance tocolysis does not appear to be beneficial at this time. Tweetable abstract: No clear benefit of nifedipine maintenance tocolysis in preterm labour on 2-year infant outcome.
KW - Maintenance tocolysis
KW - nifedipine
KW - outcome
KW - preterm birth
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978431981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1471-0528.13586
DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.13586
M3 - Article
C2 - 26330379
AN - SCOPUS:84978431981
SN - 1470-0328
VL - 123
SP - 1107
EP - 1114
JO - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
JF - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
IS - 7
ER -