TY - JOUR
T1 - Men’s sexual help-seeking and care needs after radical prostatectomy or other non-hormonal, active prostate cancer treatments
AU - Hyde, Melissa K.
AU - Opozda, Melissa
AU - Laurie, Kirstyn
AU - Vincent, Andrew D.
AU - Oliffe, John L.
AU - Nelson, Christian J.
AU - Dunn, Jeff
AU - Chung, Eric
AU - Gillman, Michael
AU - Manecksha, Rustom P.
AU - Wittert, Gary
AU - Chambers, Suzanne K.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by the Centre for Research Excellence in Prostate Cancer Survivorship (CRE-PCS), National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence 2016–2020 APP1098042. John Oliffe is supported by a Canada Research Chair (Tier 1) in Men’s Health Promotion. Acknowledgements
Funding Information:
Melissa Hyde, Melissa Opozda, Kirstyn Laurie, Andrew Vincent, John Oliffe, Christian Nelson, Jeff Dunn, Eric Chung, Michael Gillman, Rustom Manecksha, and Suzanne Chambers have nothing to disclose. Gary Wittert reports grants and non-financial support from Bayer Schering and personal fees from Besins Health Care, outside the submitted work.
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - Objective: To examine prostate cancer (PCa) survivors’ sexual help-seeking intentions, behaviours, and unmet needs. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, men who underwent active, non-hormonal treatment completed baseline (N = 558) and 6-month follow-up (N = 387) questionnaires. Theory of planned behaviour (TPB) constructs (sexual help-seeking intention, perceived behavioural control (PBC), subjective norm, attitude), masculine values (e.g., sexual importance/priority, emotional self-reliance), sex life and functioning, sexual supportive care needs, distress (anxiety, depression), and sexual help-seeking behaviour were assessed. Results: Most men (M age = 64.6 years; M years post-diagnosis = 4.0) received prostatectomy (93%), reported severe erectile dysfunction (52%), ≥ 1 unmet sexual care need (66%), and sought help from a doctor (baseline 52%, follow-up 42%). Sexual care needs were significantly associated with poorer erectile function, reduced satisfaction with sex-life, valuing sex as important/integral to identity (masculine values), and increased depression (p ≤ 0.001). Sexual help-seeking intentions were significantly associated with valuing sex as important/integral to identity, recent help-seeking, greater confidence/control, perceiving support from important others, and positive attitudes, for sexual help-seeking (p < 0.001). Significant predictors of sexual help-seeking (follow-up) were baseline intentions, recent help-seeking (p < 0.001), and increased anxiety (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Men’s unmet sexual care needs, sexual help-seeking intentions, and behaviour appear driven by the importance/value attributed to sex, distress, positive feelings, support from others, and confidence for help-seeking. Psychosocial providers are well-placed to address men’s concerns, yet few sought their assistance. Interventions to improve men’s access to effective sexual care are needed, particularly focused on reframing masculine values about the importance of sex and leveraging TPB-based predictors of help-seeking.
AB - Objective: To examine prostate cancer (PCa) survivors’ sexual help-seeking intentions, behaviours, and unmet needs. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, men who underwent active, non-hormonal treatment completed baseline (N = 558) and 6-month follow-up (N = 387) questionnaires. Theory of planned behaviour (TPB) constructs (sexual help-seeking intention, perceived behavioural control (PBC), subjective norm, attitude), masculine values (e.g., sexual importance/priority, emotional self-reliance), sex life and functioning, sexual supportive care needs, distress (anxiety, depression), and sexual help-seeking behaviour were assessed. Results: Most men (M age = 64.6 years; M years post-diagnosis = 4.0) received prostatectomy (93%), reported severe erectile dysfunction (52%), ≥ 1 unmet sexual care need (66%), and sought help from a doctor (baseline 52%, follow-up 42%). Sexual care needs were significantly associated with poorer erectile function, reduced satisfaction with sex-life, valuing sex as important/integral to identity (masculine values), and increased depression (p ≤ 0.001). Sexual help-seeking intentions were significantly associated with valuing sex as important/integral to identity, recent help-seeking, greater confidence/control, perceiving support from important others, and positive attitudes, for sexual help-seeking (p < 0.001). Significant predictors of sexual help-seeking (follow-up) were baseline intentions, recent help-seeking (p < 0.001), and increased anxiety (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Men’s unmet sexual care needs, sexual help-seeking intentions, and behaviour appear driven by the importance/value attributed to sex, distress, positive feelings, support from others, and confidence for help-seeking. Psychosocial providers are well-placed to address men’s concerns, yet few sought their assistance. Interventions to improve men’s access to effective sexual care are needed, particularly focused on reframing masculine values about the importance of sex and leveraging TPB-based predictors of help-seeking.
KW - Health service needs
KW - Help-seeking behaviour
KW - Longitudinal studies
KW - Men
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Sexuality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091511630&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00520-020-05775-5
DO - 10.1007/s00520-020-05775-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 32978635
AN - SCOPUS:85091511630
VL - 29
SP - 2699
EP - 2711
JO - Supportive Care in Cancer
JF - Supportive Care in Cancer
SN - 0941-4355
IS - 5
ER -