TY - JOUR
T1 - Obstetric and medical factors rather than psychosocial characteristics explain why eligible women do not complete the enhanced recovery after elective caesarean (EREC) pathway
T2 - A prospective cohort study
AU - Digenis, Christianna
AU - Salter, Amy
AU - Cusack, Lynette
AU - Turnbull, Deborah
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge Bronwen Klaer for her assistance with data collection. We would also like to acknowledge Meredith Hobbs and the midwives who facilitated this work at the health service as well as the women who participated in this study. Christianna Digenis was funded by the RTP Scholarship.
Funding Information:
Not applicable. Ms. Christianna Digenis was the recipient of a commonwealth funded ‘Research Training Program’ scholarship.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Background: An Australian health-service implemented an ‘enhanced recovery after elective caesarean’ pathway with next-day discharge. Problem: Previous anecdotal reports indicated that a large percentage of eligible women were not discharged the next day and therefore were not regarded as having completed the pathway. Psychosocial factors were expected to be the leading reason for prolonged hospitalisation. Aim: The study objectives were to: enumerate the percentage of women assessed as eligible for EREC who subsequently did not complete the pathway and the reasons; and to describe women's antenatal satisfaction with preparation, preferences, and perceived support. Women who completed the pathway versus those who did not were compared on antenatal biopsychosocial characteristics. Methods: This exploratory prospective cohort study enrolled consenting eligible women from antenatal clinics and used patient records and questionnaire data. Comparative statistical techniques were used. Findings: 62 % of women did not complete the pathway, with medical and obstetric factors being the most common reasons (80 %). There was statistically significant evidence of lower antenatal stress levels for those who completed EREC (median=5) relative to those who did not (median=8; P = 0.035); although these findings may not be of clinical importance. Antenatally, 51 % of women felt prepared for early discharge, 36 % needed more information, 19 % disliked hospital, 93 % agreed that family togetherness after birth was important. Most agreed that staff (76 %) and family (67 %) supported the pathway. Conclusion: This study indicated that a large percentage of women assessed as eligible did not complete EREC and that obstetric and medical factors, rather than psychosocial characteristics, largely explained this. This provides reassurance to clinicians and women that discharge home is working as intended and is useful for planning similar models of care. Higher stress levels in the antenatal period were demonstrated for women who did not complete EREC suggesting the need for further research into how to support these women.
AB - Background: An Australian health-service implemented an ‘enhanced recovery after elective caesarean’ pathway with next-day discharge. Problem: Previous anecdotal reports indicated that a large percentage of eligible women were not discharged the next day and therefore were not regarded as having completed the pathway. Psychosocial factors were expected to be the leading reason for prolonged hospitalisation. Aim: The study objectives were to: enumerate the percentage of women assessed as eligible for EREC who subsequently did not complete the pathway and the reasons; and to describe women's antenatal satisfaction with preparation, preferences, and perceived support. Women who completed the pathway versus those who did not were compared on antenatal biopsychosocial characteristics. Methods: This exploratory prospective cohort study enrolled consenting eligible women from antenatal clinics and used patient records and questionnaire data. Comparative statistical techniques were used. Findings: 62 % of women did not complete the pathway, with medical and obstetric factors being the most common reasons (80 %). There was statistically significant evidence of lower antenatal stress levels for those who completed EREC (median=5) relative to those who did not (median=8; P = 0.035); although these findings may not be of clinical importance. Antenatally, 51 % of women felt prepared for early discharge, 36 % needed more information, 19 % disliked hospital, 93 % agreed that family togetherness after birth was important. Most agreed that staff (76 %) and family (67 %) supported the pathway. Conclusion: This study indicated that a large percentage of women assessed as eligible did not complete EREC and that obstetric and medical factors, rather than psychosocial characteristics, largely explained this. This provides reassurance to clinicians and women that discharge home is working as intended and is useful for planning similar models of care. Higher stress levels in the antenatal period were demonstrated for women who did not complete EREC suggesting the need for further research into how to support these women.
KW - Caesarean section
KW - Cesarean section
KW - Early discharge
KW - Enhanced recovery
KW - Enhanced recovery after Surgery
KW - Length of stay
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184777103&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.midw.2024.103931
DO - 10.1016/j.midw.2024.103931
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85184777103
SN - 0266-6138
VL - 131
JO - Midwifery
JF - Midwifery
M1 - 103931
ER -