Opportunities to optimise care and choice in joint replacement surgery using a digitally delivered, holistic PreHab pathway

Eleanor R. Bills, Anastasia Dimopoulos, Anne Lj Burke, Kathryn L. Collins, Ecushla C. Linedale, Vicki Hume, Jackie Yeoh, Sharyn Coles, Mandy Nolan, Kate Southam, Lesley Thomas, Melanie Ramsey, Jane M. Andrews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the implementation and evaluation of a hospital-initiated, community-based, digital prehabilitation program (My PreHab Program: MPP) for adults referred for elective joint replacement. METHODS: MPP was implemented July 2022 and comprises a personalised digital health screen that guides the provision of self-management resources. Adults (>18 years) referred and accepted, or already waitlisted, for total knee/hip replacement surgery were eligible. Individuals requiring category 1 (urgent) or emergency surgery and those without a mobile phone were excluded. Implementation and intervention outcome measures (program adoption, equity of reach, fidelity, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, engagement, preliminary surgical outcomes) were explored via study-specific measures and hospital records. RESULTS: Of those invited (N = 689), 77.8% participated. Participants and non-participants were similar in key demographic variables except regional invitees were more likely to participate than metropolitan (88.0% vs 75.4%, p = .002) and non-participants tended to be older (median age = 69.0 vs 64.0, p = .005). Participants reported on average four modifiable risk factors: most commonly chronic pain (79.1%), obesity (57.3%), and frailty (40.9%). Most participants (80.4%) reviewed all resources provided and reported action/intention to address issues identified (90.9%). Participants perceived MPP as acceptable (3.2/5), appropriate (3.3/5), and feasible (3.4/5). Early trends for participants progressing to surgery (n = 33) show a reduced length of stay (MPP = 4.3, baseline = 5.3 days). CONCLUSION: MPP demonstrated high adoption, fidelity, and participant engagement. It is acceptable, appropriate and feasible and has the potential to be scaled-up digitally at low-cost. Modifiable risk factors were prevalent and early indications suggest this preoperative intervention may benefit both patients and the healthcare system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10225536241234032
JournalJournal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished or Issued - 1 May 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • arthroplasty
  • health promotion
  • length of stay
  • patients
  • perioperative medicine
  • postoperative complications
  • state medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this