TY - JOUR
T1 - Potential Overtreatment and Undertreatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Long-Term Care Facilities
T2 - A Systematic Review
AU - Stasinopoulos, Jacquelina
AU - Wood, Stephen J.
AU - Bell, J. Simon
AU - Manski-Nankervis, Jo Anne
AU - Hogan, Michelle
AU - Sluggett, Janet K.
N1 - Funding Information:
JMN has received travel grants from MSD , personal fees for independent education activities and research support from Sanofi, and research funding from Eli Lilly and Boehringer Ingelheim . MH is employed by an organization providing aged care services. JS, SW, JSB, and JKS declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Information:
JS is a recipient of the Cyril Tonkin Scholarship for PhD research at the Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University. SW is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. JSB has received research grants paid to his employer from NHMRC, Dementia Australia Research Foundation, Yulgilbar Foundation, Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration, Victorian Government Department of Health and Human Services, GSK Independent Medical Education, Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission, and several aged care provider organizations. JKS is supported by a NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (grant number APP1156439). JMN is supported by a Medical Research Future Fund Next Generation Clinical Researchers Program – TRIP Fellowship (APP1168265). The funders had no role in study design, methods, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of this manuscript. All authors had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Funding Information:
JMN has received travel grants from MSD, personal fees for independent education activities and research support from Sanofi, and research funding from Eli Lilly and Boehringer Ingelheim. MH is employed by an organization providing aged care services. JS, SW, JSB, and JKS declare no conflict of interest. JS is a recipient of the Cyril Tonkin Scholarship for PhD research at the Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University. SW is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. JSB has received research grants paid to his employer from NHMRC, Dementia Australia Research Foundation, Yulgilbar Foundation, Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration, Victorian Government Department of Health and Human Services, GSK Independent Medical Education, Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission, and several aged care provider organizations. JKS is supported by a NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (grant number APP1156439). JMN is supported by a Medical Research Future Fund Next Generation Clinical Researchers Program ? TRIP Fellowship (APP1168265). The funders had no role in study design, methods, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of this manuscript. All authors had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Objective: To investigate the prevalence, outcomes, and factors associated with potential glycemic overtreatment and undertreatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Design: Systematic review. Setting and Participants: Residents with T2DM and aged ≥60 years living in LTCFs. Measures: Articles published between January 2000 and September 2020 were retrieved following a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL plus, and gray literature. Inclusion criteria were the reporting of (1) potential overtreatment and undertreatment quantitatively defined (implicitly or explicitly) based on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and/or blood glucose; (2) prevalence, outcomes, and associated factors of potential glycemic overtreatment and undertreatment; and (3) the study involved residents of LTCFs. Results: Fifteen studies were included. Prevalence of potential overtreatment (5%–86%, n = 15 studies) and undertreatment (1.4%–35%, n = 8 studies) varied widely among facilities and geographical locations, and according to definitions used. Prevalence of potential overtreatment was 16%–74% when defined as treatment with a glucose-lowering medication in a resident with ≥1 hypoglycemia risk factor or serious comorbidity, together with a HbA1c <7% (n = 10 studies). Potential undertreatment was commonly defined as residents on glucose-lowering medication having HbA1c >8.5% and the prevalence 1.4%–14.8% (n = 6 studies). No studies prospectively measured resident health outcomes from overtreatment and undertreatment. Potential overtreatment was positively associated with use of oral glucose-lowering medications, dementia diagnosis or dementia severity, and/or need for assistance with activities of daily living (n = 2 studies). Negative association was found between potential overtreatment and use of insulin/combined insulin and oral glucose-lowering medication. No studies reported factors associated with potential undertreatment. Conclusions and Implications: The prevalence of potential glycemic overtreatment and undertreatment varied widely among residents with T2DM depending on the definition(s) used in each study. Longitudinal studies examining associations between glycemic management and health outcomes, and the use of consensus definitions of overtreatment and undertreatment are required to establish findings about actual glycemic overtreatment and undertreatment in LTCFs.
AB - Objective: To investigate the prevalence, outcomes, and factors associated with potential glycemic overtreatment and undertreatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Design: Systematic review. Setting and Participants: Residents with T2DM and aged ≥60 years living in LTCFs. Measures: Articles published between January 2000 and September 2020 were retrieved following a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL plus, and gray literature. Inclusion criteria were the reporting of (1) potential overtreatment and undertreatment quantitatively defined (implicitly or explicitly) based on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and/or blood glucose; (2) prevalence, outcomes, and associated factors of potential glycemic overtreatment and undertreatment; and (3) the study involved residents of LTCFs. Results: Fifteen studies were included. Prevalence of potential overtreatment (5%–86%, n = 15 studies) and undertreatment (1.4%–35%, n = 8 studies) varied widely among facilities and geographical locations, and according to definitions used. Prevalence of potential overtreatment was 16%–74% when defined as treatment with a glucose-lowering medication in a resident with ≥1 hypoglycemia risk factor or serious comorbidity, together with a HbA1c <7% (n = 10 studies). Potential undertreatment was commonly defined as residents on glucose-lowering medication having HbA1c >8.5% and the prevalence 1.4%–14.8% (n = 6 studies). No studies prospectively measured resident health outcomes from overtreatment and undertreatment. Potential overtreatment was positively associated with use of oral glucose-lowering medications, dementia diagnosis or dementia severity, and/or need for assistance with activities of daily living (n = 2 studies). Negative association was found between potential overtreatment and use of insulin/combined insulin and oral glucose-lowering medication. No studies reported factors associated with potential undertreatment. Conclusions and Implications: The prevalence of potential glycemic overtreatment and undertreatment varied widely among residents with T2DM depending on the definition(s) used in each study. Longitudinal studies examining associations between glycemic management and health outcomes, and the use of consensus definitions of overtreatment and undertreatment are required to establish findings about actual glycemic overtreatment and undertreatment in LTCFs.
KW - Type 2 diabetes
KW - glycemic management
KW - homes for the aged
KW - hyperglycemia
KW - hypoglycemia
KW - long-term care
KW - nursing homes
KW - overtreatment
KW - undertreatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106472048&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.04.013
DO - 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.04.013
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34004183
SN - 1525-8610
VL - 22
SP - 1889-1897.e5
JO - Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
JF - Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
IS - 9
ER -