Pulmonary-vein isolation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure

  • Mohammed N. Khan
  • , Pierre Jaïs
  • , Jennifer Cummings
  • , Luigi Di Biase
  • , Prashanthan Sanders
  • , David O. Martin
  • , Josef Kautzner
  • , Steven Hao
  • , Sakis Themistoclakis
  • , Raffaele Fanelli
  • , Domenico Potenza
  • , Raimondo Massaro
  • , Oussama Wazni
  • , Robert Schweikert
  • , Walid Saliba
  • , Paul Wang
  • , Amin Al-Ahmad
  • , Salwa Beheiry
  • , Pietro Santarelli
  • , Randall C. Starling
  • Antonio Dello Russo, Gemma Pelargonio, Johannes Brachmann, Volker Schibgilla, Aldo Bonso, Michela Casella, Antonio Raviele, Michel Haïssaguerre, Andrea Natale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

644 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary-vein isolation is increasingly being used to treat atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter clinical trial, we randomly assigned patients with symptomatic, drug-resistant atrial fibrillation, an ejection fraction of 40% or less, and New York Heart Association class II or III heart failure to undergo either pulmonary-vein isolation or atrioventricular-node ablation with biventricular pacing. All patients completed the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (scores range from 0 to 105, with a higher score indicating a worse quality of life) and underwent echocardiography and a 6-minute walk test (the composite primary end point). Over a 6-month period, patients were monitored for both symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes of atrial fibrillation. Results: In all, 41 patients underwent pulmonary-vein isolation, and 40 underwent atrioventricular-node ablation with biventricular pacing; none were lost to follow-up at 6 months. The composite primary end point favored the group that underwent pulmonary-vein isolation, with an improved questionnaire score at 6 months (60, vs. 82 in the group that underwent atrioventricular-node ablation with biventricular pacing; P<0.001), a longer 6-minute-walk distance (340 m vs. 297 m, P<0.001), and a higher ejection fraction (35% vs. 28%, P<0.001). In the group that underwent pulmonary-vein isolation, 88% of patients receiving antiarrhythmic drugs and 71% of those not receiving such drugs were free of atrial fibrillation at 6 months. In the group that underwent pulmonary-vein isolation, pulmonary-vein stenosis developed in two patients, pericardial effusion in one, and pulmonary edema in another; in the group that underwent atrioventricular-node ablation with biventricular pacing, lead dislodgment was found in one patient and pneumothorax in another. Conclusions: Pulmonary-vein isolation was superior to atrioventricular-node ablation with biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure who had drug-refractory atrial fibrillation. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00599976.)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1778-1785
Number of pages8
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume359
Issue number17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished or Issued - 23 Oct 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Cite this