TY - JOUR
T1 - Reactions of Chinese adults to warning labels on cigarette packages
T2 - A survey in Jiangsu Province
AU - Qin, Yu
AU - Wu, Ming
AU - Pan, Xiaoqun
AU - Xiang, Quanyong
AU - Huang, Jianping
AU - Gu, Zenghui
AU - Shi, Zumin
AU - Zhou, Minghao
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank all the participants involved in the survey. The help of the health workers from Nantong, Zhangjiagang in recruiting subjects is very much acknowledged. We are grateful to the staff from Jiangsu Provincial, Nangtong and Zhangjiagang Cities Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. We thank Constance Kourbelis, Tiffany Gill, and Virginia Routley for help in proof reading. There was no conflict of interest among all authors. The study is part of the China CDC-PUMC-JHSPH Project ‘towards to smoke-free China’, and financed by Bloomberg Foundation.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Background: To compare reactions to warning labels presented on cigarette packages with a specific focus on whether the new Chinese warning labels are better than the old labels and international labels. Methods. Participants aged 18 and over were recruited in two cities of Jiangsu Province in 2008, and 876 face-to-face interviews were completed. Participants were shown six types of warning labels found on cigarette packages. They comprised one old Chinese label, one new label used within the Chinese market, and one Chinese overseas label and three foreign brand labels. Participants were asked about the impact of the warning labels on: their knowledge of harm from smoking, giving cigarettes as a gift, and quitting smoking. Results: Compared with the old Chinese label, a higher proportion of participants said the new label provided clear information on harm caused by smoking (31.2% vs 18.3%). Participants were less likely to give cigarettes with the new label on the package compared with the old label (25.2% vs 20.8%). These proportions were higher when compared to the international labels. Overall, 26.8% of participants would quit smoking based on information from the old label and 31.5% from the new label. When comparing the Chinese overseas label and other foreign labels to the new Chinese label with regard to providing knowledge of harm warning, impact of quitting smoking and giving cigarettes as a gift, the overseas labels were more effective. Conclusion: Both the old and the new Chinese warning label are not effective in this target population.
AB - Background: To compare reactions to warning labels presented on cigarette packages with a specific focus on whether the new Chinese warning labels are better than the old labels and international labels. Methods. Participants aged 18 and over were recruited in two cities of Jiangsu Province in 2008, and 876 face-to-face interviews were completed. Participants were shown six types of warning labels found on cigarette packages. They comprised one old Chinese label, one new label used within the Chinese market, and one Chinese overseas label and three foreign brand labels. Participants were asked about the impact of the warning labels on: their knowledge of harm from smoking, giving cigarettes as a gift, and quitting smoking. Results: Compared with the old Chinese label, a higher proportion of participants said the new label provided clear information on harm caused by smoking (31.2% vs 18.3%). Participants were less likely to give cigarettes with the new label on the package compared with the old label (25.2% vs 20.8%). These proportions were higher when compared to the international labels. Overall, 26.8% of participants would quit smoking based on information from the old label and 31.5% from the new label. When comparing the Chinese overseas label and other foreign labels to the new Chinese label with regard to providing knowledge of harm warning, impact of quitting smoking and giving cigarettes as a gift, the overseas labels were more effective. Conclusion: Both the old and the new Chinese warning label are not effective in this target population.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951959824&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1471-2458-11-133
DO - 10.1186/1471-2458-11-133
M3 - Article
C2 - 21349205
AN - SCOPUS:79951959824
SN - 1471-2458
VL - 11
JO - BMC public health
JF - BMC public health
M1 - 133
ER -