TY - JOUR
T1 - The Adelaide Score
T2 - prospective implementation of an artificial intelligence system to improve hospital and cost efficiency
AU - the Adelaide Score Advisory Group
AU - Kovoor, Joshua G.
AU - Stretton, Brandon
AU - Gupta, Aashray K.
AU - Beath, Alexander
AU - Jacob, Mathew O.
AU - Kefalianos, John M.
AU - Carmichael, Gavin J.
AU - Zaka, Ammar
AU - O'Callaghan, Gerry
AU - Satheakeerthy, Shrirajh
AU - Booth, Andrew
AU - Delloso, Thomson
AU - Hugh, Thomas J.
AU - Chan, Weng Onn
AU - Maddern, Guy J.
AU - Balan-Vnuk, Eva
AU - Cusack, Michael
AU - Gilbert, Toby
AU - Maddison, John
AU - Bacchi, Stephen
AU - Abou-Hamden, Amal
AU - Al-Saffar, Alex
AU - Al-Sharea, Annas
AU - Arachi, Vasiliki
AU - Arafat, Yasser
AU - Arnold, Matthew
AU - Asmussen, Karl
AU - Ataie, Sara
AU - Ataie, Zahra
AU - Balogh, Zsolt
AU - Barreto, S. George
AU - Bastiampillai, Tarun
AU - Beltrame, John
AU - Bennetts, Jayme
AU - Bessen, Taryn
AU - Bhimani, Nazim
AU - Bidargaddi, Niranjan
AU - Blum, Joshua
AU - Bookun, Riteesh
AU - Bruening, Martin
AU - Canny, Ben
AU - Chan, Erick
AU - Chan, Justin
AU - Cherini, Jacob
AU - Chik, William
AU - Chow, Clara
AU - Clarke, Edward
AU - Dykes, Lukah
AU - Psaltis, Peter
AU - Zannettino, Andrew
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Background: The Adelaide Score is an artificial intelligence system that integrates objective vital signs and laboratory tests to predict likelihood of hospital discharge. Methods: A prospective implementation trial was conducted at the Lyell McEwin Hospital in South Australia. The Adelaide Score was added to existing human, artificial intelligence, and other technological infrastructure for the first 28 days of April 2024 (intervention), and outcomes were compared using parametric, non-parametric and health economic analyses, to those in the first 28 days of April 2023 (control). Artificial intelligence evaluated inpatients admitted under 18 surgical and medical teams, and patients of high likelihood of discharge were provided, on working shifts between Thursday to Sunday, to the Supportive Weekend Interprofessional Flow Team (SWIFT) comprising a senior nurse and pharmacist. Results: Two thousand nine hundred and sixty-eight admissions were included across intervention and control periods. Relative to the control group, use of the Adelaide Score in the intervention group resulted in significantly shorter median length of stay (3.1 versus 2.9 days, P = 0.028) and significantly lower seven-day readmission rate (7.1 versus 5.0%, p = 0.02). The 0.2 bed-day reduction in median length of stay produced a cost saving of $735 708.60 across the 28-day period, or $9 564 211.80 across a 52-week year. There was no significant difference between intervention and control groups in median length of stay for patients discharged on weekends, in-hospital mortality, or discharge to non-home destinations. Conclusions: The prospective implementation of the Adelaide Score was associated with improved hospital and cost efficiency, alongside lower readmissions, for patients across surgical and medical services.
AB - Background: The Adelaide Score is an artificial intelligence system that integrates objective vital signs and laboratory tests to predict likelihood of hospital discharge. Methods: A prospective implementation trial was conducted at the Lyell McEwin Hospital in South Australia. The Adelaide Score was added to existing human, artificial intelligence, and other technological infrastructure for the first 28 days of April 2024 (intervention), and outcomes were compared using parametric, non-parametric and health economic analyses, to those in the first 28 days of April 2023 (control). Artificial intelligence evaluated inpatients admitted under 18 surgical and medical teams, and patients of high likelihood of discharge were provided, on working shifts between Thursday to Sunday, to the Supportive Weekend Interprofessional Flow Team (SWIFT) comprising a senior nurse and pharmacist. Results: Two thousand nine hundred and sixty-eight admissions were included across intervention and control periods. Relative to the control group, use of the Adelaide Score in the intervention group resulted in significantly shorter median length of stay (3.1 versus 2.9 days, P = 0.028) and significantly lower seven-day readmission rate (7.1 versus 5.0%, p = 0.02). The 0.2 bed-day reduction in median length of stay produced a cost saving of $735 708.60 across the 28-day period, or $9 564 211.80 across a 52-week year. There was no significant difference between intervention and control groups in median length of stay for patients discharged on weekends, in-hospital mortality, or discharge to non-home destinations. Conclusions: The prospective implementation of the Adelaide Score was associated with improved hospital and cost efficiency, alongside lower readmissions, for patients across surgical and medical services.
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - cost saving
KW - efficiency
KW - the Adelaide score
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105002022311&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ans.19383
DO - 10.1111/ans.19383
M3 - Article
C2 - 39754371
AN - SCOPUS:85214108474
SN - 1445-1433
VL - 95
SP - 342
EP - 349
JO - ANZ Journal of Surgery
JF - ANZ Journal of Surgery
IS - 3
ER -