TY - JOUR
T1 - The Emergency Medicine Events Register
T2 - An analysis of the first 150 incidents entered into a novel, online incident reporting registry
AU - Hansen, Kim
AU - Schultz, Timothy
AU - Crock, Carmel
AU - Deakin, Anita
AU - Runciman, William
AU - Gosbell, Andrew
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - Objective: Incident reporting systems are critical to understanding adverse events, in order to create preventative and corrective strategies. There are very few systems dedicated to Emergency Medicine with published results. All EDs in Australia and New Zealand were contacted to encourage the use of an Emergency Medicine – specific online reporting system called the Emergency Medicine Events Register (EMER). Methods: We conducted an analysis of the first 150 incidents entered into EMER. EMER captures Emergency-medicine-specific details including triage score, clinical presentation, outcome, contributing factors, mitigating factors, other specialities involved and patient journey stage. These details were analysed by an expert panel. Results: Over the first 26 months, 150 incidents were reported into EMER. The most common categories reported, in order, were diagnostic error, procedural complication and investigation errors. Most incidents contained more than one category of error. The most common stage of the patient's journey in which an incident was detected was after discharge from the ED. Conclusion: A focus on correct diagnosis, procedure performance and investigation interpretation may reduce errors in the ED. The ability to learn from incidents and make system changes to enhance patient safety in healthcare organisations is an inherent part of providing a proactive, quality culture.
AB - Objective: Incident reporting systems are critical to understanding adverse events, in order to create preventative and corrective strategies. There are very few systems dedicated to Emergency Medicine with published results. All EDs in Australia and New Zealand were contacted to encourage the use of an Emergency Medicine – specific online reporting system called the Emergency Medicine Events Register (EMER). Methods: We conducted an analysis of the first 150 incidents entered into EMER. EMER captures Emergency-medicine-specific details including triage score, clinical presentation, outcome, contributing factors, mitigating factors, other specialities involved and patient journey stage. These details were analysed by an expert panel. Results: Over the first 26 months, 150 incidents were reported into EMER. The most common categories reported, in order, were diagnostic error, procedural complication and investigation errors. Most incidents contained more than one category of error. The most common stage of the patient's journey in which an incident was detected was after discharge from the ED. Conclusion: A focus on correct diagnosis, procedure performance and investigation interpretation may reduce errors in the ED. The ability to learn from incidents and make system changes to enhance patient safety in healthcare organisations is an inherent part of providing a proactive, quality culture.
KW - X-ray computed
KW - emergency services
KW - hospital errors
KW - medical online systems
KW - patient safety
KW - risk management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988448986&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1742-6723.12620
DO - 10.1111/1742-6723.12620
M3 - Article
C2 - 27476648
AN - SCOPUS:84988448986
SN - 1742-6731
VL - 28
SP - 544
EP - 550
JO - EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia
JF - EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia
IS - 5
ER -