Abstract
The flight of colours (FOC) test was compared with visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in 135 patients in a 2 year prospective study, to determine whether the FOC test is a sensitive and reliable alternative. We obtained an 80% overall agreement between the tests, confirming the levels of agreement reported by Rolak (87%) and Swart and Millac (92%). Abnormal VEPs, however, were more closely associated with cases of clinically definite multiple sclerosis (MS) while abnormal FOCs were more frequent in cases of non-demyelinating disease and cases without clinically evident optic nerve or other ocular disorder. We cannot explain this result by any demonstrated superiority of the FOC test over VEPs in non-demyelinating visual disturbances, whether clinically evident or not. Thus the study does not confirm the earlier expectation that the FOC test would be a reliable alternative to the study of VEPs in the differential diagnosis of MS.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 97-102 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Clinical and experimental neurology |
Volume | 25 |
Publication status | Published or Issued - 1988 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine