TY - JOUR
T1 - Which strategies support the effective use of clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registry data to inform health service delivery? A systematic review
AU - on behalf of The Australian Health Research Alliance (AHRA) Health System Improvement and Sustainability Working Group members
AU - Dempsey, Kathy
AU - Ferguson, Caleb
AU - Walczak, Adam
AU - Middleton, Sandy
AU - Levi, Christopher
AU - Morton, Rachael L.
AU - Boydell, Katherine
AU - Campbell, Megan
AU - Cass, Alan
AU - Duff, Jed
AU - Elliott, Catherine
AU - Geelhoed, Gary
AU - Jones, Angela
AU - Keech, Wendy
AU - Leone, Vikki
AU - Liew, Danny
AU - Linedale, Ecushla
AU - Mackinolty, Chips
AU - McFayden, Lisa
AU - Norris, Sarah
AU - Skouteris, Helen
AU - Story, David
AU - Tucker, Rowena
AU - Wakerman, John
AU - Wallis, Lauren
AU - Waterhouse, Tamsin
AU - Wiggers, John
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: Empirical evidence suggests data and insights from the clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registries are not being fully utilised, leaving health service managers, clinicians and providers without clear guidance on how best to improve healthcare delivery. This lack of uptake of existing research knowledge represents low value to the healthcare system and needs to change. Methods: Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) were systematically searched. Included studies were published between 2000 and 2020 reporting on the attributes, evidence usage and impact of clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registries on health service delivery. Results: Twenty-six articles including one randomised controlled trial, eight before-and-after studies, eight case studies/reviews, five surveys and four interview studies, covering a wide range of medical conditions and conducted in the USA, Australia and Europe, were identified. Five complementary strategies were derived to maximise the likelihood of best practice health service delivery: (1) feedback and transparency, (2) intervention sustainability, (3) clinical practice guideline adherence, (4) productive partnerships and (5) whole-of-team approach. Conclusion: These five strategies, used in context-relevant combinations, are most likely to support the application of existing high-quality data, adding value to health service delivery. The review highlighted the limitations of study design in opportunistic registry studies that do not produce clear, usable evidence to guide changes to health service implementation practices. Recommendations include exploration of innovative methodologies, improved coordination of national registries and the use of incentives to encourage guideline adherence and wider dissemination of strategies used by successful registries.
AB - Background: Empirical evidence suggests data and insights from the clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registries are not being fully utilised, leaving health service managers, clinicians and providers without clear guidance on how best to improve healthcare delivery. This lack of uptake of existing research knowledge represents low value to the healthcare system and needs to change. Methods: Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) were systematically searched. Included studies were published between 2000 and 2020 reporting on the attributes, evidence usage and impact of clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registries on health service delivery. Results: Twenty-six articles including one randomised controlled trial, eight before-and-after studies, eight case studies/reviews, five surveys and four interview studies, covering a wide range of medical conditions and conducted in the USA, Australia and Europe, were identified. Five complementary strategies were derived to maximise the likelihood of best practice health service delivery: (1) feedback and transparency, (2) intervention sustainability, (3) clinical practice guideline adherence, (4) productive partnerships and (5) whole-of-team approach. Conclusion: These five strategies, used in context-relevant combinations, are most likely to support the application of existing high-quality data, adding value to health service delivery. The review highlighted the limitations of study design in opportunistic registry studies that do not produce clear, usable evidence to guide changes to health service implementation practices. Recommendations include exploration of innovative methodologies, improved coordination of national registries and the use of incentives to encourage guideline adherence and wider dissemination of strategies used by successful registries.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141495998&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13643-022-02104-1
DO - 10.1186/s13643-022-02104-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 36352475
AN - SCOPUS:85141495998
SN - 2046-4053
VL - 11
JO - Systematic reviews
JF - Systematic reviews
IS - 1
M1 - 237
ER -